Reuse code between CST->EST and CST->AST conversion #1341
Labels
help-wanted
Community help desired. We have not scheduled time to fix this, but think it important.
internal-improvement
Refactoring, minor performance improvement, or other changes that Cedar users may never notice
Describe the improvement you'd like to request
Both conversions share similar logic, e.g., desugaring the extended
has
operator. It would be ideal that they use the same code.Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
No response
Is this something that you'd be interested in working on?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: