You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hmm, yes I think you're right. I'll look into this.
Unfortunately, from a quick look at the APA and BibTeX formatters just now, those two citation styles do make a distinction between Masters and PhD theses, so we'll need to check (and hope) that thesis-type is used in a way that helps us...
I see in the code "mastersthesis" and "phdthesis" types are used:
ruby-cff/lib/cff/formatters/apalike.rb
Lines 67 to 70 in 8f4e37e
But in 1.2.0 spec it looks like the only type is "thesis" and no "mastersthesis" or "phdthesis", and similarly in the 1.3.0 spec.
I also see that in one of the tests in this repo uses mastersthesis, even though it doesn't seem to adhere to the spec.
ruby-cff/test/files/formatter/preferred-citation-masters-thesis.cff
Line 21 in 8f4e37e
And from some of my own brief tests, I couldn't get a CITATION.cff file to validate with cffconvert if it used the type "mastersthesis".
Should the types of "mastersthesis" and "phdthesis" be replaced by a single thesis, to bring this in line with the spec?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: