Aquila X3 MAX 400x400x400 PROUI UBL #114

Jlsmith97 · 2024-02-24T16:10:53Z

Jlsmith97
Feb 24, 2024

Hi! I have attempted to compile my own firmware from this source code and have changed any values that I have been able to find to allow my 400x400x400 Aquila X3 Max to use a modified version of the Aquila X3 firmware.

However, I am running into a problem during the Auto Mesh Level where it only ends up probing 1/4 of the bed as if it was still a 220x230 bed like the X3. I have checked the settings in the firmware before compiling and even again once it has been flashed on the printer and everything shows 0 min and 400 Max but the leveling isn’t respecting it. Could anyone assist me with this? I’m not sure what I’ve missed

classicrocker883 · 2024-02-24T18:04:05Z

classicrocker883
Feb 24, 2024
Maintainer

yes this can be the Mesh Inset. change the mesh Inset values. you can find them in the Mesh settings in the menu.

13 replies

classicrocker883 Mar 1, 2024
Maintainer

thats odd, are you sure the firmware flashed? if you are unaware, sometimes you have to rename the file if it has the same name or it won't flash the new file.

so when you click Maximize Area, it should reset the mesh insets (max/min, x/y) to the max and min they can be. Center Area basically just sets the mesh square evenly.

even if you change the configuration parameters, it shouldn't load old settings as if it were somehow hard coded, it really should update them.

so you're not able to change the physical bed size in the settings?? I know there is an option to set it using custom Gcode commands, but I think with the more recent versions I disabled that to make room for other things. but it should work normally through using the LCD.

maybe you if you can upload a video id be able to see whats going on.

and to get things straight, youre able to use the printer normally at 400x400? you're able to print and everything moves as it should? but the only issue here is probing for a bed mesh right? so like only half the bed is probed?

so in Control menu, Physical Settings, once you change the Y/"X Max Position" to 400, you change Y/"X Bed Size" to 390. then go to "Unified Bed Leveling" Level menu, Mesh settings, Mest Inset (below grid points). you should then be able to change those inset values to anything 390 and under. you may have to save between menus.

in which menu is it restricting you going passed 230?

classicrocker883 Mar 1, 2024
Maintainer

I just checked this out and realized you need to "store settings" after changing the bed size, thats why it was restricting to 230.

Jlsmith97 Mar 1, 2024
Author

With the precompiled firmware I can change the bed physical settings to a max of 230 but no higher in the UI. However I have compiled my own with it set to 400 and that seems to read just fine.

I have not attempted to print anything without needing first to complete a bed level. But I have used other settings outside the level menu and it is aware that the bed is 400X400.

I have set the mesh inset sizes once I had the physical settings correct from my compiled version.

I did also hit store settings after setting these values. Do I need to completely restart the printer after saving these settings? Or should I be able to run it instantly?

I have tried running after store settings and it still uses 230x230 even though the mesh size and physical size have been made to 390x400

classicrocker883 Mar 4, 2024
Maintainer

you should not need to restart after saving the settings. I tested this and I do not run into the 230 restriction once settings are stored/saved. I have also posted a new release build for March you can try out.

which precompiled firmware file was it you were using? also if you can either post some pictures or video, or write out the steps you take like:

Go to Control menu
Go to Physical settings menu
Change ...

I mean I dont know what more I can say to help if it works as it should on my end. What I might be able to do is have it automatically save after changing the values.

in Marlin\src\lcd\e3v2\proui\dwin.cpp line ~3000
add , WriteEeprom() to the end of the function (before ; }), or copy/replace with the following.

  void SetBedSizeX() { HMI_value.axis = NO_AXIS_ENUM, SetPIntOnClick(X_BED_MIN, X_MAX_POS, ProEx.ApplyPhySet), WriteEeprom(); }
  void SetBedSizeY() { HMI_value.axis = NO_AXIS_ENUM, SetPIntOnClick(Y_BED_MIN, Y_MAX_POS, ProEx.ApplyPhySet), WriteEeprom(); }
  void SetMinPosX()  { HMI_value.axis = X_AXIS,       SetPIntOnClick(     -100,       100, ProEx.ApplyPhySet), WriteEeprom(); }
  void SetMinPosY()  { HMI_value.axis = Y_AXIS,       SetPIntOnClick(     -100,       100, ProEx.ApplyPhySet), WriteEeprom(); }
  void SetMaxPosX()  { HMI_value.axis = X_AXIS,       SetPIntOnClick(X_BED_MIN,       999, ProEx.ApplyPhySet), WriteEeprom(); }
  void SetMaxPosY()  { HMI_value.axis = Y_AXIS,       SetPIntOnClick(Y_BED_MIN,       999, ProEx.ApplyPhySet), WriteEeprom(); }
  void SetMaxPosZ()  { HMI_value.axis = Z_AXIS,       SetPIntOnClick(      100,       999, ProEx.ApplyPhySet), WriteEeprom(); }

Jlsmith97 Apr 22, 2024
Author

Just wanted to pop back and update now that I've had time to try more things. I downloaded the April N32 compiled file and it seems to be working great and respecting the new sizes!

Andreunto · 2024-11-11T12:57:40Z

Andreunto
Nov 11, 2024

I have the same problems with auto leveling on november firmware. Not level over 220x230

10 replies

classicrocker883 Nov 15, 2024
Maintainer

after INPUT_SHAPING_X/Y/Z is enabled just make sure so is SHAPING_MENU, you should be able to find it in Motion Settings under Control.

Main Menu > Control > Motion > Input Shaping

classicrocker883 Nov 15, 2024
Maintainer

With your test firmware remain the same problem. April firmware is good.

~~I have uploaded another Test here, this time it should work, I reverted some changes from April and that should fix it~~
see next comment

classicrocker883 Nov 18, 2024
Maintainer

I have uploaded a new release this should be fixed
https://github.com/classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI/releases/tag/2.1.3f-11-1

Striker7616 Jan 3, 2025

I still have the same issue with November and December release. As the other two commenters have mentioned, the April release works as expected.

classicrocker883 Jan 8, 2025
Maintainer

the same issue being the Mesh Inset does not move to the 400x400?

Striker7616 · 2025-01-08T15:11:02Z

Striker7616
Jan 8, 2025

Yes Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>

…

________________________________ From: Andrew ***@***.***> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 9:09:28 AM To: classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI ***@***.***> Cc: Striker7616 ***@***.***>; Comment ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI] Aquila X3 MAX 400x400x400 PROUI UBL (Discussion #114) the same issue being the Mesh Inset does not move to the 400x400? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#114 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BOFCPWVNVQYJ7I57R3NB5J32JU5SRAVCNFSM6AAAAABRRZFX5KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTCNZXGQ3TMMY>. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

0 replies

Striker7616 · 2025-01-08T15:25:39Z

Striker7616
Jan 8, 2025

Yes, even when you change the bed size, on the display or the source code and recompile it produces the same result. It will only probe the left hand corner for the mesh. Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>

…

________________________________ From: Andrew ***@***.***> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 9:09:28 AM To: classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI ***@***.***> Cc: Striker7616 ***@***.***>; Comment ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI] Aquila X3 MAX 400x400x400 PROUI UBL (Discussion #114) the same issue being the Mesh Inset does not move to the 400x400? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#114 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BOFCPWVNVQYJ7I57R3NB5J32JU5SRAVCNFSM6AAAAABRRZFX5KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTCNZXGQ3TMMY>. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

1 reply

classicrocker883 Jan 8, 2025
Maintainer

what file did you use/what settings so I can make another file you can test to see if it works, like for example:
[Aquila_GD32_UBL-ProUI-EX-12-12.bin]

Striker7616 · 2025-01-08T16:56:23Z

Striker7616
Jan 8, 2025

I tried all 4 versions of Aquila_N32_IND_UBL. I was wanting specifically to try the Aquila_N32_IND_UBL_ProUI_EX_IS_MPC build. Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>

…

________________________________ From: Andrew ***@***.***> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 10:40:35 AM To: classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI ***@***.***> Cc: Striker7616 ***@***.***>; Comment ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI] Aquila X3 MAX 400x400x400 PROUI UBL (Discussion #114) what file did you use/what settings so I can make another file you can test to see if it works, like for example: [Aquila_GD32_UBL-ProUI-EX-12-12.bin] — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#114 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BOFCPWUBAGAYPM2AKSV5Y6L2JVIIHAVCNFSM6AAAAABRRZFX5KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTCNZXGU4TANY>. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

0 replies

Striker7616 · 2025-01-08T17:03:04Z

Striker7616
Jan 8, 2025

I am trying to learn more about coding/firmware when it comes to 3d printing and would be more than glad to help anyway possible with testing and anything else I can be of use for. I have 4 printers so testing different versions and stuff for other printers is an option as well. I have a flashforge adventure 5m, an ender 3 pro (not stock used parts to custom build), anycubic kossel linear plus, and the Aquila x3 max. Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>

…

________________________________ From: Aaron Means ***@***.***> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 10:56:18 AM To: classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI ***@***.***>; classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI ***@***.***> Cc: Comment ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI] Aquila X3 MAX 400x400x400 PROUI UBL (Discussion #114) I tried all 4 versions of Aquila_N32_IND_UBL. I was wanting specifically to try the Aquila_N32_IND_UBL_ProUI_EX_IS_MPC build. Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>

________________________________ From: Andrew ***@***.***> Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 10:40:35 AM To: classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI ***@***.***> Cc: Striker7616 ***@***.***>; Comment ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI] Aquila X3 MAX 400x400x400 PROUI UBL (Discussion #114) what file did you use/what settings so I can make another file you can test to see if it works, like for example: [Aquila_GD32_UBL-ProUI-EX-12-12.bin] — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#114 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BOFCPWUBAGAYPM2AKSV5Y6L2JVIIHAVCNFSM6AAAAABRRZFX5KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTCNZXGU4TANY>. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

0 replies

classicrocker883 · 2025-01-08T21:53:25Z

classicrocker883
Jan 8, 2025
Maintainer

firmware-20250108-163351.zip

here is basically the same Aquila_N32_IND_UBL-ProUI-EX
let me know how this goes

0 replies

classicrocker883 · 2025-01-09T10:56:50Z

classicrocker883
Jan 9, 2025
Maintainer

firmware-20250109-055306.zip

similar to the first test, but if the first one doesnt work, try this one.

just have me know if Test1 or Test2 works or neither works

0 replies

Striker7616 · 2025-01-10T02:31:59Z

Striker7616
Jan 10, 2025

The first one works! The second one the display is all messed up even after reflashing the dwin set, so I wasnt able to test the mesh inset. Thank you so much! Is the input shaping and MPC enabled on the first one?

…

On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 4:57 AM Andrew ***@***.***> wrote: firmware-20250109-055306.zip <https://github.com/user-attachments/files/18360337/firmware-20250109-055306.zip> similar to the first test, but if the first one doesnt work, try this one. just have me know if Test1 or Test2 works or neither works — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#114 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BOFCPWQ7RKOQ4ZWEZG3AB4T2JZIYRAVCNFSM6AAAAABRRZFX5KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTCNZYGUZDENA> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: <classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI/repo-discussions/114/comments/11785224@ github.com>

1 reply

classicrocker883 Jan 10, 2025
Maintainer

firmware-20250110-030219.zip

I have both input shaping and MPC enabled on this one, it should work just like the other working one please try it out and let me know what else I can do

Striker7616 · 2025-01-10T03:20:58Z

Striker7616
Jan 10, 2025

Ok, so another strange development, everything leveled, did PID tuning and then when I went to run a print the print is scaled down and contained to the front corner.

…

On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 8:31 PM Aaron Means ***@***.***> wrote: The first one works! The second one the display is all messed up even after reflashing the dwin set, so I wasnt able to test the mesh inset. Thank you so much! Is the input shaping and MPC enabled on the first one? On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 4:57 AM Andrew ***@***.***> wrote: > firmware-20250109-055306.zip > <https://github.com/user-attachments/files/18360337/firmware-20250109-055306.zip> > > similar to the first test, but if the first one doesnt work, try this one. > > just have me know if Test1 or Test2 works or neither works > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#114 (comment)>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BOFCPWQ7RKOQ4ZWEZG3AB4T2JZIYRAVCNFSM6AAAAABRRZFX5KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTCNZYGUZDENA> > . > You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: > <classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI/repo-discussions/114/comments/11785224@ > github.com> >

1 reply

classicrocker883 Jan 10, 2025
Maintainer

I haven't enabled inputshaping or MPC either. I can do that for the next test, but im interested in what the next issue you meant. the print scaled down?? do you mean reduced in size or could this be something to do with the Gcode/Slicer?

also, try with and without M420 in the .gcode file, simply put a ; before the code --- that will disable bed leveling for the print. ex: ;M420 S1

Striker7616 · 2025-01-10T15:35:04Z

Striker7616
Jan 10, 2025

I will try this when I get home tonight. The issue I had was the print scaled down to fit the 220x220. I know that the print was cut for a 350 mm bed because it is a gcode file I have on a SD card, I have used it many times at the full size so I was really surprised. Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>

…

________________________________ From: Andrew ***@***.***> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2025 2:06:30 AM To: classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI ***@***.***> Cc: Striker7616 ***@***.***>; Comment ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI] Aquila X3 MAX 400x400x400 PROUI UBL (Discussion #114) firmware-20250110-030219.zip<https://github.com/user-attachments/files/18372576/firmware-20250110-030219.zip> I have both input shaping and MPC enabled on this one, it should work just like the other working one please try it out and let me know what else I can do — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#114 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BOFCPWRAPGSFKDYL2LLOPVL2J55QNAVCNFSM6AAAAABRRZFX5KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTCNZZGUYTENI>. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

0 replies

Striker7616 · 2025-01-11T18:16:09Z

Striker7616
Jan 11, 2025

This one works on the leveling aspect however prints are scaled down to fit 220x220 regardless of size in slicer/gcode.

…

On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 9:34 AM Aaron Means ***@***.***> wrote: I will try this when I get home tonight. The issue I had was the print scaled down to fit the 220x220. I know that the print was cut for a 350 mm bed because it is a gcode file I have on a SD card, I have used it many times at the full size so I was really surprised. Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> ------------------------------ *From:* Andrew ***@***.***> *Sent:* Friday, January 10, 2025 2:06:30 AM *To:* classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI ***@***.***> *Cc:* Striker7616 ***@***.***>; Comment < ***@***.***> *Subject:* Re: [classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI] Aquila X3 MAX 400x400x400 PROUI UBL (Discussion #114) firmware-20250110-030219.zip <https://github.com/user-attachments/files/18372576/firmware-20250110-030219.zip> I have both input shaping and MPC enabled on this one, it should work just like the other working one please try it out and let me know what else I can do — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#114 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BOFCPWRAPGSFKDYL2LLOPVL2J55QNAVCNFSM6AAAAABRRZFX5KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTCNZZGUYTENI> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: <classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI/repo-discussions/114/comments/11795125@ github.com>

1 reply

classicrocker883 Jan 11, 2025
Maintainer

that is strange, but the first Test1 -firmware-20250108-163351.zip that worked in both ways flawlessly??

Striker7616 · 2025-01-11T22:18:40Z

Striker7616
Jan 11, 2025

No, the first test worked the same as the last one. The mesh inset adjusts and it will level the whole bed but it will not print on it. It will only print on the left front 220mm square

…

On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 3:00 PM Andrew ***@***.***> wrote: that is strange, but the first Test1 -firmware-20250108-163351.zip that worked in both ways flawlessly?? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#114 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BOFCPWQEEFSH7SPJIP7DQFL2KGBAPAVCNFSM6AAAAABRRZFX5KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTCOBQHA2TMNI> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: <classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI/repo-discussions/114/comments/11808565@ github.com>

1 reply

classicrocker883 Jan 11, 2025
Maintainer

oh i see Mesh Inset = Okay, but Bed Size not Okay.

so to be sure none of the tests worked perfectly?

Striker7616 · 2025-01-11T23:51:46Z

Striker7616
Jan 11, 2025

Correct, everything looks good until you actually try to print. Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>

…

________________________________ From: Andrew ***@***.***> Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2025 5:36:14 PM To: classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI ***@***.***> Cc: Striker7616 ***@***.***>; Comment ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI] Aquila X3 MAX 400x400x400 PROUI UBL (Discussion #114) oh i see Mesh Inset = Okay, but Bed Size not Okay. so to be sure none of the tests worked perfectly? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#114 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BOFCPWUMG7WY2B3AOAYLMX32KGTG5AVCNFSM6AAAAABRRZFX5KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTCOBQHEYTSNQ>. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

1 reply

classicrocker883 Jan 12, 2025
Maintainer

MRiscoCfirmware.zip

here is MRiscoC's upstream firmware, filament runout sensor had to be disabled.
try this out let me know how it works out for you. ( it is going to look very different just FYI)

and you did say April's firmware version worked great, no issues printing? no issues with mesh inset?
because that is what I am working with trying to revert whatever changes had been made.

Striker7616 · 2025-01-12T17:46:01Z

Striker7616
Jan 12, 2025

This one doesn't work at all, does it need a different display firmware? When I try to move through the menus it reboots. Yes, the april firmware works on both the mesh inset and the printing.

…

On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 9:01 AM Andrew ***@***.***> wrote: MRiscoCfirmware.zip <https://github.com/user-attachments/files/18389832/MRiscoCfirmware.zip> here is MRiscoC's upstream firmware, filament runout sensor had to be disabled. try this out let me know how it works out for you. and you did say April's firmware version worked great, no issues printing? no issues with mesh inset? because that is what I am working with trying to revert whatever changes had been made. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#114 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BOFCPWQ5PCB2L5O3ZT4YWFL2KJ7V3AVCNFSM6AAAAABRRZFX5KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTCOBRGIZTQOA> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: <classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI/repo-discussions/114/comments/11812388@ github.com>

2 replies

classicrocker883 Jan 14, 2025
Maintainer

MRiscoC-Ex-firmware.zip

this one should work, its updated and the "Experimental" version of his. I'm just curious if this works.

but looks like I will be reverting changes back to April, hopefully that'll be it and we can call it a day! :-D

classicrocker883 Jan 14, 2025
Maintainer

firmware-April-newer.zip

do me a favor though, there is a difference between the Released firmware and Repo firmware. let me know if this one firmware-April-newer (which comes from the Repo version) works the same as the other April one which you say works perfectly.

Striker7616 · 2025-01-14T18:51:30Z

Striker7616
Jan 14, 2025

Unfortunately neither of these work. On the mriscoc i cant select anything it causes the screen to refresh as if you have rebooted the printer. On the april repo firmware, the mesh inset does not change to probe the whole bed. In addition prints that worked on april release version are scaled down.

…

On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 7:34 AM Andrew ***@***.***> wrote: firmware-April-newer.zip <https://github.com/user-attachments/files/18410956/firmware-April-newer.zip> do me a favor though, there is a difference between the Released firmware and Repo firmware. let me know if this one firmware-April-newer (which comes from the Repo version) works the same as the other April one which you say works perfectly. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#114 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BOFCPWVWCKOAZDYQSIVPDAL2KUG6FAVCNFSM6AAAAABRRZFX5KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTCOBTGE3TONI> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: <classicrocker883/MRiscoCProUI/repo-discussions/114/comments/11831775@ github.com>

0 replies

Aquila X3 MAX 400x400x400 PROUI UBL #114

Replies: 16 comments · 31 replies

classicrocker883 Feb 24, 2024 Maintainer

classicrocker883 Mar 1, 2024 Maintainer

classicrocker883 Mar 1, 2024 Maintainer

Jlsmith97 Mar 1, 2024 Author

classicrocker883 Mar 4, 2024 Maintainer

Jlsmith97 Apr 22, 2024 Author

classicrocker883 Nov 15, 2024 Maintainer

classicrocker883 Nov 15, 2024 Maintainer

classicrocker883 Nov 18, 2024 Maintainer

classicrocker883 Jan 8, 2025 Maintainer

classicrocker883 Jan 8, 2025 Maintainer

classicrocker883 Jan 8, 2025 Maintainer

classicrocker883 Jan 9, 2025 Maintainer

classicrocker883 Jan 10, 2025 Maintainer

classicrocker883 Jan 10, 2025 Maintainer

classicrocker883 Jan 11, 2025 Maintainer

classicrocker883 Jan 11, 2025 Maintainer

classicrocker883 Jan 12, 2025 Maintainer

classicrocker883 Jan 14, 2025 Maintainer

classicrocker883 Jan 14, 2025 Maintainer

Replies: 16 comments 31 replies

classicrocker883
Feb 24, 2024
Maintainer

classicrocker883 Mar 1, 2024
Maintainer

classicrocker883 Mar 1, 2024
Maintainer

Jlsmith97 Mar 1, 2024
Author

classicrocker883 Mar 4, 2024
Maintainer

Jlsmith97 Apr 22, 2024
Author

classicrocker883 Nov 15, 2024
Maintainer

classicrocker883 Nov 15, 2024
Maintainer

classicrocker883 Nov 18, 2024
Maintainer

classicrocker883 Jan 8, 2025
Maintainer

classicrocker883 Jan 8, 2025
Maintainer

classicrocker883
Jan 8, 2025
Maintainer

classicrocker883
Jan 9, 2025
Maintainer

classicrocker883 Jan 10, 2025
Maintainer

classicrocker883 Jan 10, 2025
Maintainer

classicrocker883 Jan 11, 2025
Maintainer

classicrocker883 Jan 11, 2025
Maintainer

classicrocker883 Jan 12, 2025
Maintainer

classicrocker883 Jan 14, 2025
Maintainer

classicrocker883 Jan 14, 2025
Maintainer