-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CaloTower hash off by one? #209
Comments
Also, is this the preferred sort condition for |
Also, For now I will use the underlying |
Just to confirm - the intention is to set the calo tower at (ieta, iphi) to be at vector index caloTowerHash(ieta, iphi). Example in the dummy producer here I see the unpacker in l1t-integration-802 does not behave like this. Looks like this is due to a fix being forgotten in the old days before we submitted PRs to l1t-integration. I'll make a new PR correcting this. |
* Initial commit of TQ emulation + kfout updates * Code checks * Claire's Comments * Update BuildFile.xml Include hls types in build file * Create clf_GBDT_emulation_newKF_digitized.json * Ian's comments 1 from PR cms-l1t-offline#209 Update to comments in KFout producer and update to variable names as per CMS naming conventions * Fix Partial Track functions * fix code formatting --------- Co-authored-by: Christopher <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Christopher Brown <[email protected]>
In checking data/emulator comparisons for Layer1, I noticed that the requested indexing hash
CaloTools::caloTowerHash()
seems to skip an entry at 4032.It also seems to include ieta +/- 29 between 4896 and 5041.
Is this expected?
This means that
caloTowerHash(41, 72) == caloTowerHashMax()
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: