Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WALKSacramento Project [Proposed 2/15/17] #20

Open
reganking opened this issue Feb 16, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

WALKSacramento Project [Proposed 2/15/17] #20

reganking opened this issue Feb 16, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@reganking
Copy link

reganking commented Feb 16, 2017

WALKSacramento presentation by Kirin Kumar to Code for Sacramento 2/15/17
Organization website: http://www.walksacramento.org/

Kirin pitched promotional/advocacy, coding, and policy innovation needs to the Code4Sac group and solicited interest for building a Code4Sac team.

Following team hacked a solution for WALKSacramento 9AM-12PM, 2/18/17 @ Hacker Lab Sacramento

** Code4Sac Team**

WALKSacramento Goals

  • By noon, create something people can use today
  • Extract top 50 points of interest observation points from existing audit PDFs
  • QA for new data set
  • Feature: Add marker clusters to map (see Regan’s marker cluster prototype)
  • Integration with a field application <-> Structure of field observation to mirror Fusion Table schema

Results:

Code for Sacramento - Where to Go from Here?

  • WALKSacramento Case Study (TBD Kirin)
  • Tutorial for using Fusion Tables for data exploration / viability / alternatives (TBD)
  • Ideas: Potential integration with municipal Online Service Request Systems (e.g., Rancho Cordova “Fresh Connect” App / "My City Hall”), e.g., cities could share data with WALKSacramento -> Cross-Agency Multiplier

Next Steps
[Suggestions?]


Extended Notes
Please feel free to edit/expand.

Which improvement goals does the project have?

  • Re-position WALKSacramento as an active advocate (currently functioning "behind the scenes")
  • Collection: Innovate the audit collection process with new collection methods
  • Storage: Innovate a central location system and API showing all recommendations to support other advocacy groups and opportunities for expanded use
  • Promotional: Build in a way to show successes, e.g., through better presentation of resulting recommendations and change recipient testimonials (showing outcomes and helping planners better understand the real value)
  • Cross-Agency Multiplier: Connect various agencies like transportation, affordable housing, creek restoration, workplace health advocacy, etc.

Who are the primary recipients/audience of the program improvement?

  • Staff at local jurisdictions
  • Elected officials wanting to make a point in their communities
  • Community members (business, school, advocacy organizations, etc.)
  • WALKSacramento staff

What does an audit entail?

  • Does not start with a checklist since there are too many variables ("millions"?)
  • Physical and Google street view used for initial and follow-up assessments
  • Report requirements are highly dependent on local restrictions, planning groups dynamics, and overall political context
  • Final report format is PDF and not because a "chain of custody" is required by clients

How are audits used?

  • Audits reports provide improvement recommendations to municipal planners
  • ...

Next Steps

  • Solicit Code4Sac interest and determine project feasibility and broad stroke goals
  • Pending Code4Sac evaluation, setup new project
  • Format existing audit data for further access (suggested 6 month process and possibly utilizing intern support)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant