Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gateway users/service accounts and ACL's management #1

Open
erwan-b opened this issue Sep 19, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Gateway users/service accounts and ACL's management #1

erwan-b opened this issue Sep 19, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@erwan-b
Copy link

erwan-b commented Sep 19, 2024

Hello,

In your roadmap I don't see anything about user/service-accounts and there ACL's.
We are using local user and need to create them on the go with IAC.
Having TF ressources to manage them would be highly valuable.

@JamesW1
Copy link

JamesW1 commented Sep 19, 2024

Hi @erwan-b - thanks for your feedback. Support for all Gateway resources is in our roadmap beyond Kafka resources / Self-service resources, but this could be subject to change.

In the interim, are you aware this is possible using our CLI? See the resources reference. Note that IaC support for ACLs is not there yet, we'll address that soon.

@qboileau qboileau added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 29, 2024
@framiere
Copy link

framiere commented Dec 9, 2024

#31

@Stu-conduktor
Copy link
Contributor

Hi an update on this, we have merged a preliminary version of service accounts, that could be tested if you created the provider locally. We haven't released this yet as we want to improve the experience of now working with Gateway and Console to be more explicit when defining resources and look at creating interceptors too.

I will comment back here when we have finished this work and it's released, thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants