Underflow / overflow terms are used incorrectly

[Xeverous]

03-Style - line 368

The text mentions "integer underflow". There is no such thing. Underflow (that is, truncation to zero) happens only for floating point types.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6360049/what-are-arithmetic-underflow-and-overflow-in-c

[maz3max]

Curious. I always thought integer underflow meant passing the lowest representable number. Not sure if I am too happy with calling it integer overflow or integer wrap-around instead.

[Xeverous]

Think of overflow as an absolute value that is too large to fit inside.