Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Feature] Improve NGINX static hosting configuration #201

Open
TimidRobot opened this issue Feb 9, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

[Feature] Improve NGINX static hosting configuration #201

TimidRobot opened this issue Feb 9, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
💻 aspect: code Concerns the software code in the repository ✨ goal: improvement Improvement to an existing feature 🟩 priority: low Low priority and doesn't need to be rushed 🏁 status: ready for work Ready for work

Comments

@TimidRobot
Copy link
Member

TimidRobot commented Feb 9, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Problem

Current NGINX static hosting configurations do not take advantage of:

  • add header Cache-Control
  • sendfile
  • tcp_nopush
  • tcp_nodelay
  • etc.

Description

Optimize static file hosting using documented best practices.

Alternatives

Do nothing 🤷🏻

Additional context
@TimidRobot TimidRobot added 🟩 priority: low Low priority and doesn't need to be rushed 🏁 status: ready for work Ready for work ✨ goal: improvement Improvement to an existing feature 💻 aspect: code Concerns the software code in the repository labels Feb 9, 2023
@TimidRobot TimidRobot mentioned this issue Feb 9, 2023
Merged
7 tasks
@TimidRobot TimidRobot moved this to Backlog in Shafiya-Heena Sep 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
💻 aspect: code Concerns the software code in the repository ✨ goal: improvement Improvement to an existing feature 🟩 priority: low Low priority and doesn't need to be rushed 🏁 status: ready for work Ready for work
Projects
Shafiya-Heena
Status: Backlog
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@TimidRobot