You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am writing a set of conformance tests for FDC3, which is a way for different applications (e.g. web apps) to collaborate in a workflow.
Ideally, I'd like to package these conformance tests as a web GUI, rather than running from the command line. This is something you can do with Mocha, say.
✨ What's your proposed solution?
Cucumber appears to have lots of dependencies on things like node:fs - are these dependencies isolated? Can they be replaced with others? For example, could I load .feature files with a URL rather than a file path?
⛏ Have you considered any alternatives or workarounds?
If you're still working on this, I've made a Vitest plugin that parses Gherkin feature files at quickpickle. It's basically a replacement for CucumberJS as a test runner, but using all of the official parsing bits. Would love to hear if it would work in the browser but don't have time to test at the moment.
🤔 What's the problem you're trying to solve?
Hi,
I am writing a set of conformance tests for FDC3, which is a way for different applications (e.g. web apps) to collaborate in a workflow.
Ideally, I'd like to package these conformance tests as a web GUI, rather than running from the command line. This is something you can do with Mocha, say.
✨ What's your proposed solution?
Cucumber appears to have lots of dependencies on things like node:fs - are these dependencies isolated? Can they be replaced with others? For example, could I load
.feature
files with a URL rather than a file path?⛏ Have you considered any alternatives or workarounds?
I've tried unsuccessfully using Vite Polyfills and also looked at Vitest Cucumber Plugin
📚 Any additional context?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: