Complement of disjunction

[hansbogert]

To preempt the A/B question I'll post a longer example, and my presumed minimal reproducer thereafter.

I'm trying to do the following:

#systemProjectId: "someId"
#systemProjectNames: "system"|"monitoring"

#projects: [... ({
  name: #systemProjectNames
  annotations: systemProjectId: #systemProjectId
} | {
  name: !#systemProjectNames
})]


projects:  #projects  & [
  {
    name: "system"
    annotations: systemProjectId: "someId"
  },
  {
    name: "other"
  }
]

I get

projects.1: 4 errors in empty disjunction:
projects.1.name: 2 errors in empty disjunction:
projects.1.name: conflicting values "monitoring" and "other":
    ./test.cue:2:31
    ./test.cue:4:13
    ./test.cue:5:9
    ./test.cue:12:12
    ./test.cue:18:11
projects.1.name: conflicting values "system" and "other":
    ./test.cue:2:22
    ./test.cue:4:13
    ./test.cue:5:9
    ./test.cue:12:12
    ./test.cue:18:11
projects.1.name: unresolved disjunction "system" | "monitoring" (type string):
    ./test.cue:8:9

I think the minimal reproducer is:

#foo: "1" | "2"

foo: !#foo & "3"

I get:

foo: unresolved disjunction "1" | "2" (type string):
    ./test2.cue:3:6

I'm not sure what unresolved means in this case. Conceptually this does not seem like much of a stretch to ask of the typing system, am I wrong?

[myitcv]

Hi @hansbogert - unfortunately you have just run into #2656.

Your intuition around using ! is solid: however in CUE that is actually spelt a different way.

What you tried to write was (play):

#foo: "1" | "2"

foo: !#foo & "3"

In CUE today that needs to be written as follows (play):

#foo: "1" | "2"

foo: "3"
_foo_ok: true & ((foo & #foo) == _|_)

In future (#943) this will be written:

#foo: "1" | "2"

foo: not(#foo) & "3"

[hansbogert]

Thank you for the concise answer. Hoping for the not() in the future, because that looks neat.

[myitcv]

@jpluscplusm - a good hopefully short-lived doc here.

[jpluscplusm]

cue-lang/docs-and-content#160 opened.