You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Perhaps keyword arguments would be better than positional arguments. That is: have contexts yield dictionaries, and pass by key name rather than position. This might not be backwards-compatible without some switch.
Currently the above would treat the dict as a single, positional argument. If we had yielded a two-tuple, the test would receive the app as 'templates'. The benefit of this idea is that we can easily "skip" arguments. Downsides would be the need to name argument and the possibility of name conflicts (however unlikely).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Perhaps keyword arguments would be better than positional arguments. That is: have contexts yield dictionaries, and pass by key name rather than position. This might not be backwards-compatible without some switch.
Currently the above would treat the dict as a single, positional argument. If we had yielded a two-tuple, the test would receive the app as 'templates'. The benefit of this idea is that we can easily "skip" arguments. Downsides would be the need to name argument and the possibility of name conflicts (however unlikely).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: