Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Do try to (re)mint DOIs for prior failed to be minted but released dandisets #1953

Open
yarikoptic opened this issue Jun 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Do try to (re)mint DOIs for prior failed to be minted but released dandisets #1953

yarikoptic opened this issue Jun 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
DOI

Comments

@yarikoptic
Copy link
Member

yarikoptic commented Jun 5, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Relates to

Discovered in the course of

ATM we have 2 (only! phewph) dandisets with failed to be produced DOI records:

❯ grep -B1 '<!DOCTYPE html>' dandi.bib | grep DANDISET
# DANDISET 000029
# DANDISET 000252

edit: updated as of 20241101 -- no new missing bib but here is a summary over also other datacite errors (as of 4.3 version of datacite we use, which is not final 4.3) and metadata errors (with current pydantic model) we have

❯ grep msg dandi_datacite.meta-errors.json | sort | uniq -c
      4    "msg": "Field required",
      3    "msg": "Input should be 'Anatomy'",
      3    "msg": "Input should be 'Disorder'",
      9    "msg": "String should match pattern '^[a-zA-Z0-9-]+:[a-zA-Z0-9-/\\._]+$'",
❯ grep message dandi_datacite.datacite-errors.json | sort | uniq -c
     16    "message": "'IsPublishedIn' is not one of ['IsCitedBy', 'Cites', 'IsSupplementTo', 'IsSupplementedBy', 'IsContinuedBy', 'Continues', 'IsDescribedBy', 'Describes', 'HasMetadata', 'IsMetadataFor', 'HasVersion', 'IsVersionOf', 'IsNewVersionOf', 'IsPreviousVersionOf', 'IsPartOf', 'HasPart', 'IsReferencedBy', 'References', 'IsDocumentedBy', 'Documents', 'IsCompiledBy', 'Compiles', 'IsVariantFormOf', 'IsOriginalFormOf', 'IsIdenticalTo', 'IsReviewedBy', 'Reviews', 'IsDerivedFrom', 'IsSourceOf', 'IsRequiredBy', 'Requires', 'IsObsoletedBy', 'Obsoletes']",
     90    "message": "'ROR' is not one of ['ISNI', 'GRID', 'Crossref Funder ID', 'Other']",
❯ grep 'No valid' dandi.bib
# No valid BibTeX for 000029/0.210712.1903. Starts with <!DOCTYPE html>
# No valid BibTeX for 000029/0.230317.1553. Starts with <!DOCTYPE html>
# No valid BibTeX for 000029/0.231017.1955. Starts with <!DOCTYPE html>
# No valid BibTeX for 000029/0.231017.1959. Starts with <!DOCTYPE html>
# No valid BibTeX for 000252/0.230408.2207. Starts with <!DOCTYPE html>
# No valid BibTeX for 000252/0.230408.2207. Starts with <!DOCTYPE html>
@yarikoptic yarikoptic mentioned this issue Jun 5, 2024
Draft
@yarikoptic
Copy link
Member Author

@djarecka -- IIRC you had worked in the past with all that datacite doi minting. Could you please take a look into what can potentially has caused those two to miss a DOI and write a little helped to mint a DOI if it is missing? then I think we could just add it to that script I prototyped in dandi/dandi-cli#1449 so we could mint DOIs in case if they are missing if we discover such cases while updating a bibliography file.

@waxlamp waxlamp added the DOI label Aug 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
DOI
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@yarikoptic @waxlamp