You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some might argue that metadata "fixes" should not result in dandiset "modified" time but in the current model IMHO they should. Without that API would not provide reliable means for efficient monitoring/mirroring of the archive (as we e.g. need for backups2datalad) since it would be impossible to rely on "modified" timestamp as indicator of having or not changes in the dandiset. Could
A number of dandisets got their assets metadata updated but dandiset time stamp was not modified.
I believe due to
access
field from asset blob #2010fix we got now changes like this in metadata records
Some might argue that metadata "fixes" should not result in dandiset "modified" time but in the current model IMHO they should. Without that API would not provide reliable means for efficient monitoring/mirroring of the archive (as we e.g. need for backups2datalad) since it would be impossible to rely on "modified" timestamp as indicator of having or not changes in the dandiset. Could
access
field from asset blob #2010 be adjusted so to trigger corresponding dandiset(s) modified time stamp be adjusted?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: