You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I believe this request was in relationship to questionnairs from protocollabs while investigating data access schemes if data gets deposited to IPFS. It relates to typical scenarios on how people access data -- are the same files get re-accessed immediately, or typically just once and then not again for a while. I do not truly remember hot/warm separation idea here, but we can make it following that "Cold" - prior to first access in current period (day? week?) it was not accessed for a week. "Warm" - was accessed within last day, "Hot" - was accessed within last hour.
So e.g. for overall transfer of 1TB of data, we could have Cold: 900G, Warm: 90G, Hot: 10G thus showing that primarily data is accessed once and only small portion (1%) could benefit from some kind of faster caching layer to speed up access. But we could also see Cold: 10G, Warm: 90G, Hot: 900G suggesting that having some cache over overall slow storage backend could be of great benefit since most of the time data is immediately reaccessed.
cold - over a week I guess
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: