Is AutoMoq should work with asp.net core?

[arielcloud]

when trying install it i got:
"Package AutoMoq 2.0.0 is not compatible with netcoreapp1.0 (.NETCoreApp,Version=v1.0). Package AutoMoq 2.0.0 supports: net45 (.NETFramework,Version=v4.5)"

[darrencauthon]

Hmm... I think.

Guess it's time I learn how to port these libraries over. 😄

[darrencauthon]

Installed dot net core. So long as I can map unity and Moq to this library, this is gonna work.

[darrencauthon]

@arielcloud I started the work to port to core, and it seems that it won't be too difficult.

However, AutoMoq is very dependent on Moq, which doesn't seem to have a working version in core yet. The copy of core-supporting Moq that I'm using comes from https://www.myget.org/F/aspnetcidev/api/v3/index.json, which is fine for development but can't be released.

I'll get this core version ready to go, but until moq is updated I won't release.

[arielcloud]

Thanks a lot!
please update here or at #36 once i can use it on core. (also before release). 10x!

[arielcloud]

@darrencauthon moq is updated :) can u release?

[darrencauthon]

I'll take a look soon, thanks!

[JPBlancoDB]

You can use Moq with net core, you need in your project.json:

 "dependencies": { 
        "NUnit": "3.5.0",
        "dotnet-test-nunit": "3.4.0-beta-3",
        "Moq": "4.6.25-alpha"
    },
    "frameworks": {
        "netcoreapp1.0": {
            "imports": [ 
                "dotnet54",
                "portable-net45+win8" ,
                "dnxcore50",
                "netcoreapp1.0"        
            ],
            "dependencies": {
                "Microsoft.NETCore.App": {
                    "type": "platform",
                    "version": "1.0.1"
                }
            }
        }
    },

[darrencauthon]

Thank you @JPBlancoDB ! 😄

[MihaMarkic]

They are already at 4.6.38-alpha :)

[darrencauthon]

I did see a video on Dot Net Core on Youtube... I think this is going to be easy to do this weekend.

Or did I just doom myself?

[MihaMarkic]

@darrencauthon That's it. You promised it over the weekend. Now you just have to! :)

[darrencauthon]

I will give it an honest try! 😄

[darrencauthon]

I had a wonderful weekend with the kids... I barely touched a computer.

I'm going to do the 24 pull request challenge this December, and this is going to be a big piece of it. So I will get to this ASAP. 😄

[NicolaasVB]

Any news on this?

Thanks

[cdie]

@darrencauthon Have you progressed on .NET Core port ? It really interest us

[darrencauthon]

I have, in a way. I've gotten tons of help with porting another one of my libraries to Core, and it's shown me another strategy.  It's just a matter of time. The last few months have been pretty hectic for me, as can be noted by my github stats. As soon as I can sit in front of a computer for 2-3 hours, I think I can knock it out.  On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 6:53 AM -0600, "Christophe" <[email protected]> wrote: @darrencauthon Have you progressed on .NET Core port ? It really interest us — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[onlyforkbj]

Could you catch up some time to spend on porting the libraries to .Net Core?

[darrencauthon]

Eventually, I'm really sorry... juggling a lot of stuff these days. 🤹‍♂️

[farzadmf]

+1 for having support for .NET Core

[careLearning]

+1 for .Net Core support. I discovered this package from Mathew Renze's Writing Testable Code course on PluralSight. Now it is less fun to develop without.

[arielcloud]

meanwhile u can try autoFixture

[matthewrenze]

I was just checking up on the status of the .NET Core port and saw that @careLearning mentioned my Clean Architecture course. Good to see that it's generating interest in AutoMoq! : )

[celluj34]

Not my repo, but I found a "fork" that supports .net standard 2.0: https://github.com/ThomasHenrique2/AutoMoqCore

[giggio]

Thanks, @celluj34. I migrated to AutoMoqCore.

[collinprice]

Moq has added Moq.AutoMocker. The method names are different but its basically a drop in replacement and appears to be active.