You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I tested your model (dlib_face_recognition_resnet_model_v1) using LFW, but result is 85%, while you told us it has accuracy 99.38%. I wonder if any recommendation to boost the accuracy. I think the problem in face preparation before feature extractor. After we determine the five points of landmarks, what is the next steps (the alignment method, centered method for the faces).
thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 8:04 AM HeshamAMH ***@***.***> wrote:
I tested your model () using LFW, but result is 85%, while you told us it
has accuracy 99.38%. I wonder if any recommendation to boost the accuracy.
I think the problem in face preparation before feature extractor. After we
determine the five points of landmarks, what is the next steps *(the
alignment method, centered method for the faces).*
thanks in advance.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#43>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABPYFR4C2CLKZYJHU6MDG4TTAJI4HANCNFSM4YAPOMBQ>
.
I tested your model (dlib_face_recognition_resnet_model_v1) using LFW, but result is 85%, while you told us it has accuracy 99.38%. I wonder if any recommendation to boost the accuracy. I think the problem in face preparation before feature extractor. After we determine the five points of landmarks, what is the next steps (the alignment method, centered method for the faces).
thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: