-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 361
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: Bump (most) deps #1081
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
chore: Bump (most) deps #1081
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Jason Miller <[email protected]>
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 9d764e5 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
Size Change: +1.2 kB (+4.69%) 🔍 Total Size: 26.9 kB
|
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ | |||
{ | |||
"compilerOptions": { | |||
"moduleResolution": "node", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
tslib
otherwise can't be found, oddly. This should be the default but maybe rtp2 is doing something odd.
- name: compressed-size-action | ||
uses: preactjs/compressed-size-action@v2 | ||
with: | ||
pattern: 'test/fixtures/**/dist/!(*.map)' | ||
build-script: 'test' | ||
repo-token: '${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Test suite already covers this really, we don't need a separate readout for file size bumps in a PR comment.
Also this is not aligning w/ the 'Test' CI action, probably Node version differences that isn't worth trying to hack around
This is IMO very important to merge. I need to manualy override "rollup-plugin-typescript2" to latest (0.36.0) everywhere I use microbundle, else it can't compile typescript because it can't find the types:
I had the solution found a year or so ago, but forgot about it and did get cought by it again and wasted a few hours to find out how to solve it. Workaround: Add this to your
If you use npm workspaces make sure it is overwritten and not existing anymore in |
@developit If you have a few minutes, would appreciate a peek at this and potentially #1082 & #1083 -- we're starting to hit dep rot |
@@ -2320,26 +2319,26 @@ modern-generators | |||
|
|||
|
|||
Build \\"modern-generators\\" to dist: | |||
248 B: modern-generators.js.gz | |||
201 B: modern-generators.js.br | |||
2.57 kB: modern-generators.js.gz |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we ok with this massive increase?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey, long time no see! Hope all is well & good w/ you.
Mentioned this above in a resolved comment:
Oh nice,
7.18.0
ended up inlining regenerator as a normal helper, dropping the global: babel/babel#14538This is a sizable increase but IMO it's completely reasonable.
I still think this is reasonable, but admittedly, I was very much not a fan of Babel's previous behavior.
Do you disagree with this? I suppose we could work around it and revert to previous behavior if we really needed to.
src/lib/babel-custom.js
Outdated
@@ -7,6 +7,16 @@ const ESMODULES_TARGET = { | |||
esmodules: true, | |||
}; | |||
|
|||
// silence Babel 7.13+ loose-with-assumptions warnings |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why do we want to silence this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great question, will look into it & improve the comment (or remove this entirely) as I don't quite remember myself.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the mention! Indeed, seems like a silly hack I inserted when testing and forgot to clean up/fix.
Supersedes #969