Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Periodic structures not respecting 4-bonds per C rule #22

Open
brandimarte opened this issue Oct 31, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Periodic structures not respecting 4-bonds per C rule #22

brandimarte opened this issue Oct 31, 2018 · 5 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@brandimarte
Copy link
Member

This happens when two vertices are connected within the unit cell and through neighboring cells. See for instance examples graphene_rep1x1 and graphene_rep1x2.

@brandimarte
Copy link
Member Author

Some discussion about this issue was previously initiated in the comments of 37c0b15.

@brandimarte
Copy link
Member Author

brandimarte commented Oct 31, 2018

I've tried the idea of creating an extended adjacency matrix for so to distinguish neighbors intra- and inter-cell comment. This can be easily done at the adjacencyG function, however no Kekule structure can be found with our present algorithm.

@brandimarte
Copy link
Member Author

@tfrederiksen wrote:

I thought it should be sufficient to compute bond-orders expressed as pairs within one cell. Apart from very small cells (like graphene_rep1x1) it should be easy to disentangle at the visualization stage if a given bond is intra- or inter-cell related. Maybe it is better to discuss in person or open a dedicated issue.

By the way, I was thinking a bit this afternoon about what would be the correct bond orders for extended graphene and believe that the answers are PBO=1.3333 and HBO=1.525: I can draw 6 Kekule structures for graphene (three sites for Clar sextets) of which a given pair of atoms only has two drawings with a double bond (4xsingle+2xdouble)/6=8/6. For HBO I found the number both numerically and in a literature reference to C. A. Coulson and R. Taylor, Proc. Phys. Soc., London, Sect. A 65, 815 (1952) (but I couldn't download the pdf).

For the examples graphene_rep2x2 and graphene_rep3x3, the calculated PBO is indeed 1.33...

@tfrederiksen
Copy link
Member

Looking at kekules_periodic.pdf for rep2x2 I am a bit surprised not to find two solutions corresponding to a Clar sextet in the central hexagon...

@tfrederiksen
Copy link
Member

No, I was wrong; the rep2x2 case looks OK.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants