You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have tried to compare which, multi or full mode, is better to perform the deconvolution in my case, where I am working with Visium 10X Genomics Spatial Transcriptomics data of spinal cord with a single-nucleus reference. However, the mean result for the samples is quite disparate along the samples in some cell types.
Here you are an example of some spots. Why do neurons increase as much?
I want to show also a comparison I have done for each cell type in both modes.
In the image I have represented the mean value of the weight for each cell type in all the spots from each slice. I have 4 slices from the same patient (reference & slice 2-4), 3 slices each one from a different sample (samples 2-4), and the mean for the seven slices.
What I am looking is that in general for the multi mode (blue) the weights are lower for most of the cell types. However I had understood that multi mode should be the four more abundant cell types per spot, what should mean a normalized value higher for all cell types and not only for the neurons in my case. I am not sure if maybe when the multi mode selects the four more abundant cell types, those weights from cell types which are not considered are added to the most abundant cell types increasing their weight and equaling the four of them.
I hope you could help me understanding and choosing the best option to my problem.
Thank you so much.
Victor Gaya
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
vagm110901
changed the title
Very different results between multi and full mode
How to choose the best mode multi or full?
Feb 13, 2025
Hello,
I have tried to compare which, multi or full mode, is better to perform the deconvolution in my case, where I am working with Visium 10X Genomics Spatial Transcriptomics data of spinal cord with a single-nucleus reference. However, the mean result for the samples is quite disparate along the samples in some cell types.
Here you are an example of some spots. Why do neurons increase as much?
Or here. Why have I lost the Oligodendrocytes when they have a value similar to Astrocytes?
I want to show also a comparison I have done for each cell type in both modes.
In the image I have represented the mean value of the weight for each cell type in all the spots from each slice. I have 4 slices from the same patient (reference & slice 2-4), 3 slices each one from a different sample (samples 2-4), and the mean for the seven slices.
What I am looking is that in general for the multi mode (blue) the weights are lower for most of the cell types. However I had understood that multi mode should be the four more abundant cell types per spot, what should mean a normalized value higher for all cell types and not only for the neurons in my case. I am not sure if maybe when the multi mode selects the four more abundant cell types, those weights from cell types which are not considered are added to the most abundant cell types increasing their weight and equaling the four of them.
I hope you could help me understanding and choosing the best option to my problem.
Thank you so much.
Victor Gaya
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: