Asset comparison should look at the nuspec content

[ViktorHofer]

Probably most of the nuspec metadata is interesting to compare. Some should be excluded, i.e. package version and package dependencies' version.

Example nuspec:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<package xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/packaging/2011/10/nuspec.xsd">
  <metadata>
    <id>VS.Redist.Common.NetCore.Toolset.x64.10.0</id>
    <version>10.0.100-preview.3.25161.31</version>
    <title>VS.Redist.Common.NetCore.Toolset.x64.10.0</title>
    <authors>Microsoft</authors>
    <owners>Microsoft</owners>
    <requireLicenseAcceptance>true</requireLicenseAcceptance>
    <licenseUrl>https://www.microsoft.com/net/dotnet_library_license.htm</licenseUrl>
    <projectUrl>https://github.com/dotnet/core-sdk</projectUrl>
    <description>.NET Core 10.0 SDK Toolset (x64) Windows Installer MSI as a .nupkg for internal Visual Studio build consumption</description>
    <copyright>© Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.</copyright>
  </metadata>
</package>

[mmitche]

Closed with dotnet/sdk#47700