Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Excception in message for Heartbeat each time i connect the Gimal #985

Open
JorgeCosta87 opened this issue Nov 11, 2019 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #990
Open

Excception in message for Heartbeat each time i connect the Gimal #985

JorgeCosta87 opened this issue Nov 11, 2019 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #990

Comments

@JorgeCosta87
Copy link

JorgeCosta87 commented Nov 11, 2019

Hello, I'm having an error each time i connect the gimbal (STorM32), to the pixhawk :

raise APIException: mode (6, 0) not available on mavlink definition
ERROR:dronekit:Exception in message handler for HEARTBEAT

raise APIException("mode (%s, %s) not available on mavlink definition" % (m.custom_mode, m.base_mode))
APIException: mode (6, 0) not available on mavlink definition
CRITICAL:autopilot:STorM32 v0.96 v1.30 F103RC
CRITICAL:autopilot:OlliW 323BGC

anyone knows how to solve this ?

@Guohao91
Copy link

same problem

@kiranshila
Copy link

It sure does seem like this project was abandoned. The last update to master was in November and I submitted the PR to fix this issue back then. Who knows what's happening.

@bobn3
Copy link

bobn3 commented Feb 14, 2020

Hi, I'm having this same problem. Pixhawk 2.1 with Storm32 gimbal, using latest dronekit and ardupilot versions, followed the steps here and verified that the gimbal does respond to RC's ch7 and moves accordingly, however, when trying it out with python it doesn't move (it does read the gimbal position correctly though), and it raises this exception:

**raise APIException("mode (%s, %s) not available on mavlink definition" % (m.custom_mode, m.base_mode))

dronekit.APIException: mode (6, 128) not available on mavlink definition**

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants