You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Why is this feature valuable to you? Does it solve a problem you're having?
The Dropbox API and SDK cover a large range of functionality while some apps only use a small subset. This may be particularly true for some namespaces such as team and team_log which require different Dropbox subscriptions.
Importing all modules to cover the full API requires a relatively large amount of memory (~30 MB without 3rd party modules such as requests). A large fraction of this actually comes from the team_log namespace.
Describe the solution you'd like
Would it be possible to have separate classes for different namespaces and import modules only as needed? This of course would be a major change in design and may deviate from how other Dropbox SDKs handle this. Nevertheless, it may be worth considering, especially as new namespaces to support an evolving product will be added in the future.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Lazy loading of modules, at the point of use, may be an alternative.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Why is this feature valuable to you? Does it solve a problem you're having?
The Dropbox API and SDK cover a large range of functionality while some apps only use a small subset. This may be particularly true for some namespaces such as
team
andteam_log
which require different Dropbox subscriptions.Importing all modules to cover the full API requires a relatively large amount of memory (~30 MB without 3rd party modules such as requests). A large fraction of this actually comes from the
team_log
namespace.Describe the solution you'd like
Would it be possible to have separate classes for different namespaces and import modules only as needed? This of course would be a major change in design and may deviate from how other Dropbox SDKs handle this. Nevertheless, it may be worth considering, especially as new namespaces to support an evolving product will be added in the future.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Lazy loading of modules, at the point of use, may be an alternative.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: