GridDiag wrapper failure #3166
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
@mpm-meto, I see you have a question about MET's I did some testing and chatted with @georgemccabe about this. I do want to point out this important detail about MET's
@georgemccabe confirmed that each input file passed to the GridDiag wrapper is added with it's own BUT @georgemccabe did see that it may be single quotes wreaking havoc. In your config settings, please try removing the single quotes from the names. So change... TO: And rerun. Does that produce better results? @georgemccabe and I need to brainstorm whether additional logic is needed in the GridDiag wrapper to handle the setting of the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Moving a conversation over email with @mpm-meto into a discussion for the benefit of other users. Listed below is the original question...
I am rerunning some use cases I last ran in mid-2024 with MET11.0.0. The GridDiag compared the same variable in two different files. Like this.
Unfortunately this doesn’t work. It fails with:
I have belatedly concluded that the reason it worked before is that the filenames were the same but they were in different directories. The code does not appear to work when the filenames and directories are different (as above).
I don’t know how to get around this. I can’t give them the same name as the expid is important from a metadata perspective. Data volumes dictate that I can’t duplicate and rename somehow. I can only think of very hacky and very convoluted ways to proceed…. Like use
ncksto extract the field from each file and save both in the same filename template in different directories… is that my only option? I guess I could also revert to just bypassing the wrapper. That should work as well.Any thoughts?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions