-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
/
AppendixB.Rmd
610 lines (426 loc) · 19.3 KB
/
AppendixB.Rmd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
---
title: 'Supplemental Information: CH3MS-RF'
author: "Emily Barnes Franklin"
date: "1/29/2022"
output:
html_document: default
pdf_document: default
---
```{r setup, include=FALSE}
knitr::opts_chunk$set(echo = TRUE)
```
# Supplemental Information: R Code for Implementation of Ch3MS-RF
# (Chemical Characterization by Chromatography-MS Random Forest Modeling)
```{r libs, echo=FALSE, message = FALSE, warning=FALSE}
library(Rcpp)
library(caret) # cross validation
library(randomForest)
library(gbm)
library(nnet)
library(ROCR)
library(caTools)
library(MASS)
library(dplyr)
library(tidyverse)
library(scales)
library(akima)
library(grid)
library(OrgMassSpecR)
library(glue)
library(openxlsx)
library(janitor)
library(rpart) # CART
library(rpart.plot) # CART plotting
library(CHNOSZ)
library(Metrics)
library(data.table)
```
## Custom Functions
Here we define custom functions that will be useful later in the analysis.
```{r CustomF, warning=FALSE}
# left join, but filling all empty cells with "False" instead of NA
left_joinF <- function(x, y, fill = FALSE){
z <- left_join(x, y)
tmp <- setdiff(names(z), names(x))
z <- replace_na(z, setNames(as.list(rep(fill, length(tmp))), tmp))
z
}
# left join, but filling all empty cells with "0" instead of NA
left_join0<- function(x, y, fill = 0){
z <- left_join(x, y)
tmp <- setdiff(names(z), names(x))
z <- replace_na(z, setNames(as.list(rep(fill, length(tmp))), tmp))
z
}
#r squared
rsq <- function (x, y) cor(x, y) ^ 2
#Out of sample R squared, for evaluating prediction performance
# with a training and test set
OSR2 <- function(predictions, train, test) {
SSE <- sum((test - predictions)^2)
SST <- sum((test - mean(train))^2)
r2 <- 1 - SSE/SST
return(r2)
}
# function for formatting mass spectral parsing
trim.leading <- function (x) sub("^\\s+", "", x)
```
## Reading In Data Files
In this section, the necessary data files for analysis are read in. The first of these files is a .csv file containing the names, retention indexes, and mass spectra of all of the external standard (or training dataset) components. The mass spectra are in the form of a semicolon separated string. The second file is a .csv file containing the names, formulae, functional group categories, and vapor pressures of the known training data set. Functional group categories are required to allow the external standard data set to be split into training and test subsets while maintaining a proportional representation of different functional group types between the sets. Note that any properties of interest could be added to this file and substituted into the training and property prediction framework described below. Finally, we provide an example unknown sample .csv for property prediction. The required fields in this file are Name (unique identifier for each unknown compound), retention index, and mass spectrum.
```{r Data, warning=FALSE, message = FALSE}
# First required file: .csv file containing mass spectra, see template file
# for formatting
MS_table_o <- read_csv("EBF_GoldsteinGroup_ExternalStandard_GoA2018_ms.csv")
# Second required file: .csv containing relevant properties of compounds
# (both those needed to split training and test datasets and properties
# that are the intended predicted result)
Prop_table_o <- read_csv("EBF_GoldsteinGroup_ExternalStandard_GoA2018_properties.csv")
# Third resuired file: .csv of retenion index and mass spectra of unknown sample \
#compounds of interest
Unk_table_o <- read_csv("EBF_GoldsteinGroup_Template_Unknown_Dataset.csv")
```
## Parsing Mass Spectra
The principle peaks and the mass differences between key peaks are the key indicators of functional groups that exert the greatest influence on the calibration factor of the compound in question. In this section, the top 10 peaks (by intensity) are identified for each compound. Then, the top 40 peaks (the 40 peaks which appear in the most compounds from the external standard list) are turned into factors, for which each compound is represented by 0 if the peak is not in the top 10 for that compound or an intensity value between 0 and 1000 if that peak is one of the top 10 peaks for that compound.
```{r MS_peak_parse, warning=FALSE}
p.n <- 10 #Number of major peaks to consider from each mass spectrum when making list of most common peaks
p.l.l <- 40 # number of common peaks to turn into features
ES_table_t = MS_table_o %>%
dplyr::mutate(MS = strsplit(as.character(MS), ";")) %>%
unnest(MS) %>%
filter(MS != "") %>%
dplyr::mutate(MS2 = trim.leading(MS))
ES_table_3 = separate(data = ES_table_t, col = MS2, into = c("mz", "intensity"), sep = " ")
ES_table_full = ES_table_3 %>%
dplyr::mutate(intensity = as.numeric(intensity)) %>%
dplyr::mutate(mz = as.numeric(mz)) %>%
arrange(desc(intensity)) %>%
arrange(desc(Name)) %>%
group_by(Name) %>%
dplyr::mutate(my_ranks = order(order(intensity, decreasing=TRUE))) %>%
ungroup()
ES_names <- MS_table_o %>%
dplyr::select("Name")
ES_table_trimmed = ES_table_full %>%
filter(my_ranks <= p.n)
mz_tab <- as.data.frame(table(ES_table_trimmed$mz))
mz_tab <- mz_tab %>%
dplyr::mutate(mz = as.character(Var1)) %>%
dplyr::mutate(mz = as.numeric(mz))
mz_tab <- mz_tab %>%
arrange(desc(Freq)) %>%
dplyr::mutate(freq_ranks = order(order(Freq, decreasing = TRUE)))
ES_table_ranked <- ES_table_trimmed %>%
left_join(mz_tab) %>%
filter(freq_ranks <= p.l.l)
ES_common_mz = ES_table_ranked %>%
dplyr::select(Name, mz, intensity) %>%
dplyr::mutate(mz = paste("mz_", mz, sep = "_")) %>%
dplyr::mutate(mz_obs = TRUE) %>%
dplyr::mutate(mz_intensity = intensity)
peak_list.es <- ES_common_mz %>%
dplyr::select(mz) %>%
dplyr::mutate(istop40 = TRUE) %>%
distinct(mz, istop40, .keep_all = TRUE)
wide_mz = ES_common_mz %>%
dplyr::select(Name, mz, mz_obs) %>%
spread(mz, mz_obs, fill = FALSE)
wide_mz <- ES_names %>%
left_joinF(wide_mz)
wide_mz_i = ES_common_mz %>%
dplyr::select(Name, mz, mz_intensity) %>%
spread(mz, mz_intensity, fill = 0)
wide_mz_i <- ES_names %>%
left_join0(wide_mz_i)
```
Next, the losses are determined. The mass differences between the top 5 peaks for each compound are evaluated and turned into their own list. The 20 losses/neutral mass differences which appear most frequently become true/false factors for inclusion in future analysis.
```{r Ms_loss_parse, warning=FALSE}
l.n <- 5 # number of major peaks to consider when identifying losses between major peaks
l.l.l <- 20 # number of common neutral mass differences to convert into features
unique_names = unique(ES_table_trimmed$Name)
x = seq(1, l.n, 1)
y = x
d2 <- expand.grid(x = x, y = y, KEEP.OUT.ATTRS = FALSE)
d2 <- d2 %>%
filter(y > x)
xt = d2$x
yt = d2$y
names_losses = as.character(rep(unique_names, each = length(d2$x)))
losses_vec = rep(999, times = length(names_losses))
loss_num = rep(seq(1, length(xt), 1), times = length(unique_names))
losses <- data.frame(names_losses, losses_vec, loss_num)
losses = losses %>%
dplyr::mutate(names_losses = as.character(names_losses))
for(i in 1:nrow(losses)) {
#i = 1
name_t = names_losses[i]
loss_num_t = losses$loss_num[i]
upper_index = xt[loss_num_t]
lower_index = yt[loss_num_t]
df_t = ES_table_trimmed %>%
filter(Name == name_t)
upper_mz = df_t$mz[upper_index]
lower_mz = df_t$mz[lower_index]
losses$losses_vec[i] = abs(upper_mz - lower_mz)
}
arranged_mz <- ES_table_trimmed %>%
arrange(desc(mz)) %>%
arrange(desc(Name)) %>%
dplyr::mutate(loss_fast = 0)
for(i in 2:nrow(arranged_mz)){
arranged_mz$loss_fast[i]= arranged_mz$mz[i-1]-arranged_mz$mz[i]
}
arranged_mz.t <- as.data.frame(table(arranged_mz$loss_fast)) %>%
dplyr::mutate(num_loss = as.character(Var1)) %>%
dplyr::mutate(num_loss = as.numeric(num_loss)) %>%
filter(num_loss > 0) %>%
arrange(desc(Freq)) %>%
dplyr::mutate(id = row_number())
losses = losses %>%
left_join(arranged_mz.t, by = c("losses_vec"= "num_loss"))
losses_trimmed = losses %>%
filter(id <= l.l.l)
ES_common_losses = losses_trimmed %>%
dplyr::select(names_losses, losses_vec) %>%
dplyr::mutate(losses_vec = paste("loss_", losses_vec, sep = "_")) %>%
dplyr::mutate(Loss_obs = TRUE) %>%
distinct()
loss_list.es <- ES_common_losses %>%
dplyr::select(losses_vec) %>%
dplyr::mutate(istop20 = TRUE) %>%
distinct(losses_vec, istop20, .keep_all = TRUE)
wide_losses = ES_common_losses %>%
spread(losses_vec, Loss_obs, fill = FALSE) %>%
right_join(ES_names, by = c("names_losses"= "Name")) %>%
rename(Name = names_losses)
wide_losses[is.na(wide_losses)] <- FALSE
```
This process is repeated for the data set of unknown compounds, as the data sets must be identically formatted for the property prediction to proceed smoothly. The peaks and mass differences from the known data set are again the features, as generating new features for the unknown compounds would create a lack similarity between the training data and the predictive data.
```{r MS_parse_unk, warning=FALSE}
unk_table_t = Unk_table_o %>%
dplyr::mutate(MS = strsplit(as.character(MS), ";")) %>%
unnest(MS) %>%
filter(MS != "") %>%
dplyr::mutate(MS2 = trim.leading(MS))
unk_table_3 = separate(data = unk_table_t, col = MS2, into = c("mz", "intensity"), sep = " ")
unk_table_full = unk_table_3 %>%
dplyr::mutate(intensity = as.numeric(intensity)) %>%
dplyr::mutate(mz = as.numeric(mz)) %>%
arrange(desc(intensity)) %>%
arrange(desc(Name)) %>%
group_by(Name) %>%
dplyr::mutate(my_ranks = order(order(intensity, decreasing=TRUE))) %>%
ungroup()
unk_names <- Unk_table_o %>%
dplyr::select("Name")
unk_table_trimmed = unk_table_full %>%
filter(my_ranks <= p.n)
mz_tab.a <- as.data.frame(table(unk_table_trimmed$mz))
mz_tab.a <- mz_tab.a %>%
dplyr::mutate(mz = as.character(Var1)) %>%
dplyr::mutate(mz = as.numeric(mz))
mz_tab.a <- mz_tab.a %>%
arrange(desc(Freq)) %>%
dplyr::mutate(freq_ranks = order(order(Freq, decreasing = TRUE)))
unk_table_ranked <- unk_table_trimmed %>%
left_join(mz_tab.a)
# note- here selecting only the MZ of the most common ES list so that the
#model will be usable
unk_common_mz = unk_table_ranked %>%
dplyr::select(Name, mz, intensity) %>%
dplyr::mutate(mz = paste("mz_", mz, sep = "_")) %>%
dplyr::mutate(mz_obs = TRUE) %>%
dplyr::mutate(mz_intensity = intensity) %>%
right_join(peak_list.es) %>%
filter(istop40 == TRUE) %>%
dplyr::select(-istop40)
wide_mz.a = unk_common_mz %>%
dplyr::select(Name, mz, mz_obs) %>%
spread(mz, mz_obs, fill = FALSE) %>%
filter(!is.na(Name))
wide_mz.a <- unk_names %>%
left_joinF(wide_mz.a)
wide_mz_i.a = unk_common_mz %>%
dplyr::select(Name, mz, mz_intensity) %>%
spread(mz, mz_intensity, fill = 0) %>%
filter(!is.na(Name))
wide_mz_i.a <- unk_names %>%
left_join0(wide_mz_i.a)
# moving on to losses of the sample/unknown compounds
unique_names.a = unique(unk_table_trimmed$Name)
x = seq(1, l.n, 1)
y = x
d2 <- expand.grid(x = x, y = y, KEEP.OUT.ATTRS = FALSE)
d2 <- d2 %>%
filter(y > x)
xt = d2$x
yt = d2$y
names_losses.a = as.character(rep(unique_names.a, each = length(d2$x)))
losses_vec.a = rep(999, times = length(names_losses.a))
loss_num.a = rep(seq(1, length(xt), 1), times = length(unique_names.a))
losses.a <- data.frame(names_losses= names_losses.a, losses_vec = losses_vec.a, loss_num = loss_num.a)
losses.a = losses.a %>%
dplyr::mutate(names_losses = as.character(names_losses))
for(i in 1:nrow(losses.a)) {
#i = 1
name_t = names_losses.a[i]
loss_num_t = losses.a$loss_num[i]
upper_index = xt[loss_num_t]
lower_index = yt[loss_num_t]
df_t = unk_table_trimmed %>%
filter(Name == name_t)
upper_mz = df_t$mz[upper_index]
lower_mz = df_t$mz[lower_index]
losses.a$losses_vec[i] = abs(upper_mz - lower_mz)
}
arranged_mz.a <- unk_table_trimmed %>%
arrange(desc(mz)) %>%
arrange(desc(Name)) %>%
dplyr::mutate(loss_fast = 0)
for(i in 2:nrow(arranged_mz.a)){
arranged_mz.a$loss_fast[i]= arranged_mz.a$mz[i-1]-arranged_mz$mz[i]
}
arranged_mz.t.a <- as.data.frame(table(arranged_mz.a$loss_fast)) %>%
dplyr::mutate(num_loss = as.character(Var1)) %>%
dplyr::mutate(num_loss = as.numeric(num_loss)) %>%
filter(num_loss > 0) %>%
arrange(desc(Freq)) %>%
dplyr::mutate(id = row_number())
losses.a = losses.a %>%
left_join(arranged_mz.t.a, by = c("losses_vec"= "num_loss"))
losses_trimmed.a = losses.a
unk_common_losses = losses_trimmed.a %>%
dplyr::select(names_losses, losses_vec) %>%
dplyr::mutate(losses_vec = paste("loss_", losses_vec, sep = "_")) %>%
dplyr::mutate(Loss_obs = TRUE) %>%
distinct() %>%
right_join(loss_list.es) %>%
filter(istop20 == TRUE) %>%
dplyr::select(-istop20)
wide_losses.a = unk_common_losses %>%
spread(losses_vec, Loss_obs, fill = FALSE) %>%
filter(!is.na(names_losses)) %>%
right_join(unk_names, by = c("names_losses"= "Name")) %>%
rename(Name = names_losses)
wide_losses.a[is.na(wide_losses.a)] <- FALSE
```
## Parsing Chemical Formulae
Now that the mass spectra have been parsed, we parse the chemical formulae of the external standard compounds to generate potential properties of interest for modeling.
```{r Form_Parse, message=FALSE, warning=FALSE}
Element <- c("C", "H", "O", "N", "S")
d.e <- data.frame(Element = Element)
# creating columns for the number of atoms of each element to parse chemical formulae
ES_info_all.form <- Prop_table_o %>%
dplyr::mutate(Cnum = 0) %>%
dplyr::mutate(Hnum = 0) %>%
dplyr::mutate(Onum = 0) %>%
dplyr::mutate(Nnum = 0) %>%
dplyr::mutate(Snum = 0)
for(i in 1:nrow(ES_info_all.form)){
#i = 10
form.t <- ES_info_all.form$ChemFormula[i]
form.t1 <- data.frame(makeup(form.t))
setDT(form.t1, keep.rownames = TRUE)[]
names(form.t1)<- c("Element", "num")
form.t2 <- d.e %>%
left_join0(form.t1)
form.t3 <- data.frame(form.t2[,-1])
rownames(form.t3) <- form.t2[,1]
form.t4 <- data.frame(t(form.t3))
names(form.t4) <-c("C", "H", "O", "N", "S")
ES_info_all.form$Cnum[i]= form.t4$C[1]
ES_info_all.form$Hnum[i]= form.t4$H[1]
ES_info_all.form$Onum[i]= form.t4$O[1]
ES_info_all.form$Nnum[i]= form.t4$N[1]
ES_info_all.form$Snum[i]= form.t4$S[1]
}
ES_info_all.prop <- ES_info_all.form %>%
dplyr::mutate(O_C_ratio = Onum/Cnum) %>%
dplyr::mutate(H_C_ratio = Hnum/Cnum) %>%
dplyr::mutate(OSc = (2*O_C_ratio)-H_C_ratio)
pf <- names(ES_info_all.prop)
# creating a list for easy removal of non predictive features later
Predictive_Features <- pf[pf!="Retention_Index"]
```
## Preparing training and test sets
Here we identify the property of interest, prepare a data tables with only the relevant predictive information and the property of interest, and split into test and training sets. In this example case, we select carbon number as the property of interest to predict using the model.
```{r Train_Test, warning=FALSE}
ES_info_all <- ES_info_all.prop %>%
mutate(Prop = Cnum) %>% #Cnum can be substituted for any other property of interest, including vapor pressure, O:C, OSc, etc.
left_join(wide_mz_i) %>%
left_join(wide_losses) %>%
filter(!is.na(Prop)) # limiting training and test sets to compounds for which we have known properties for the training compounds
# now splitting standard compounds into training and test sets
split.ratio = .8 #setting split to 80:20- this can be adjusted depending on external standard size
set.seed(111)
split = sample.split(ES_info_all$Func_Group_Cat_3, SplitRatio = 0.8)
ES_info_all.train <- filter(ES_info_all, split == TRUE)
ES_info_all.test <- filter(ES_info_all, split == FALSE)
#Visualizations to identify how similarly distributed the training and test sets are
boxplot(ES_info_all.train$Retention_Index, ES_info_all.test$Retention_Index, names = c("Training Set", "Test Set"))
boxplot(ES_info_all.train$O_C_ratio, ES_info_all.test$O_C_ratio, names = c("Training Set", "Test Set"))
# if the test set is outside the bounds of the training, a different split should be selected as the predictive performance will not be good.
# The same check will be applied to the unknown sample compounds.
# training set appears to cover the bounds of the test set fairly well, proceeding
# now removing all of the other predictive properties so that the data frames are ready for the model
ES.train <- ES_info_all.train %>%
dplyr::select(-Predictive_Features)
ES.test <- ES_info_all.test %>%
dplyr::select(-Predictive_Features)
```
## Random Forest Modeling of Selected Property
Next, we use 5-fold cross validation to identify the optimal number of features for feature restriction in creating diverse trees, identify the optimal model, predict the properties for the test set, and evaluate prediction performance.
```{r Modeling}
# training random forest model on the training ES subset
rf.mtry.max = 40 # setting the maximum number of features for mtry feature restriction
# Proceeding with 5-fold cross validation
set.seed(144)
train.rf = train(Prop ~., data = ES.train, method = "rf", tuneGrid = data.frame(mtry=seq(1, rf.mtry.max, 1)), trControl = trainControl(method = "cv", number = 5), metric = "RMSE", na.action = na.exclude)
best.rf = train.rf$finalModel
best.rf
rf.plot <- ggplot(train.rf$results, aes(x=mtry, y=Rsquared)) + geom_line(lwd=2) +
ylab("Accuracy of Predictions")
rf.plot
Cat.mm = as.data.frame(model.matrix(Prop ~., data = ES.test))
set.seed(124)
pred.best.rf = predict(best.rf, newdata = Cat.mm, type = "class")
# creating a field for the predicted property for the test set
ES.test$Prop.p <- pred.best.rf
#out of sample R2
OSR2(ES.test$Prop.p, ES.train$Prop, ES.test$Prop)
# mean average error
MAE(ES.test$Prop.p, ES.test$Prop)
# correlation coefficient of real and predicted values
rsq(ES.test$Prop.p, ES.test$Prop)
line <- data.frame(x = c(min(ES.test$Prop), max(ES.test$Prop)),
y = c(min(ES.test$Prop), max(ES.test$Prop)))
# visualizing the distribution of true vs predicted properties
p.c <- ES.test %>%
ggplot(aes(x = Prop, y = Prop.p))+
geom_point()+
geom_line(data = line, aes(x = x, y = y))+
xlab("True Property")+
ylab("Predicted Property")+
theme_bw(base_size = 16)
p.c
```
## Predicting Properties of Unknown Compounds
Next, we evaluate and prepare a dataframe for property prediction on the unknown compound dataset
```{r Predicting}
Unk_table_mod.n <- Unk_table_o %>%
dplyr::select(Name, Retention_Index) %>%
left_join(wide_mz_i.a) %>%
left_join(wide_losses.a)
boxplot(ES_info_all.train$Retention_Index, Unk_table_mod.n$Retention_Index, names = c("Training Set", "Prediction Set"))
# clear here that the prediction/unknown data set lies within the bounds of the training data set, ok to proceed. If significant outliers exist, the training set should be altered to include more representative compounds or the outliers should be removed from prediction and not utilized to make conclusions about the data set.
Unk_table_mod <- Unk_table_mod.n %>%
dplyr::select(-Name) %>%
dplyr::mutate(Prop = -999) # creating a dummy variable to make the model matrix
Cat.mm.unk = as.data.frame(model.matrix(Prop ~., data = Unk_table_mod))
pred.best.unk <- predict(best.rf, newdata = Cat.mm.unk, type = "class")
Unk_table_mod.n$Prop.p <- pred.best.unk
# tidy final output table with the names and predicted properties of the sample compounds
Unk_table_tidy <- Unk_table_mod.n %>%
dplyr::select(Name, Prop.p)
#exporting the output table for ease of use
#write.csv(Unk_table_tidy, "Example_Output_Table.csv")
```