Siteplan export to pdf

[TruongQuangSB]

• The PR Siteplan export to Image #1306 is change in Javascript/Typescript
• Reviewer can review both Part in this commit or separate, but should only merge this PR

[github-actions]

Test Results

121 tests  ±0   121 ✅ ±0   13s ⏱️ -1s
 28 suites ±0     0 💤 ±0 
 28 files   ±0     0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9d92382. ± Comparison against base commit 3675c8d.

This pull request removes 9 and adds 9 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.

org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[1] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@3e84111a
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[2] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@6ab7ce48
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[3] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@43f0c2d1
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[4] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@5fb65013
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[5] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@38a1a26
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[1] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@69d667a5, expected=multi/container-id/element-id]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[2] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@7fe87c0e, expected=multi/456/123]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[1] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@23469199, second=other], expected=multi/container-id/element-id/other=other]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[2] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@1b60d324, second=xxx], expected=multi/456/123/other=xxx]

org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[1] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@446c3920
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[2] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@7cb8437d
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[3] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@41f4fe5
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[4] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@15f8701f
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[5] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@514cd540
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[1] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@271e851e, expected=multi/container-id/element-id]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[2] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@ff21443, expected=multi/456/123]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[1] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@41938e1e, second=other], expected=multi/container-id/element-id/other=other]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[2] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@401926df, second=xxx], expected=multi/456/123/other=xxx]

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[TruongQuangSB]

/request-license-review

[mariusheine]

@TruongQuangSB Have you written all the XSL related stuff by yourself or is there some generator on basis of the siteplan_template.xsl?

[TruongQuangSB]

@TruongQuangSB Have you written all the XSL related stuff by yourself or is there some generator on basis of the siteplan_template.xsl?

y, this was writed manual and have some copied from table_template.xsl, common.xsl

[TruongQuangSB]

@TruongQuangSB Have you written all the XSL related stuff by yourself or is there some generator on basis of the siteplan_template.xsl?

ah, i have wrong understand. The XSL will be generator on basis of the siteplan_template, see package org.eclipse.set.utils.export.xsl.siteplan

[github-actions]

License summary

❌ Not yet vetted dependencies:

Dependency	License	Status	Ticket
npm/npmjs/-/eslint/9.19.0	MIT AND (LGPL-2.0-or-later AND MIT) AND ISC AND OFL-1.1 AND CC-BY-SA-2.0 AND BSD-3-Clause AND (LicenseRef-scancode-proprietary-license AND MIT)	restricted	#19293
npm/npmjs/-/ol/10.4.0	BSD-2-Clause AND (BSD-2-Clause AND LicenseRef-scancode-free-unknown) AND MIT AND Apache-2.0 AND (LicenseRef-scancode-proprietary-license AND ODbL-1.0) AND ODbL-1.0 AND CC-BY-4.0 AND LicenseRef-scancode-proprietary-license AND OGC-1.0 AND (CC-BY-SA-2.0 AND CC-BY-SA-3.0) AND (BSD-2-Clause AND CC-BY-3.0 AND MIT) AND LicenseRef-scancode-softsurfer AND (CC-BY-SA-4.0 AND LicenseRef-scancode-proprietary-license AND OGC-1.0)	restricted	#19302

• Committers can request a license review via by commenting /request-license-review.
• After all reviews have concluded, Committers can re-run the license-vetting check by commenting /license-check

Workflow run (with attached summary files):
https://github.com/eclipse-set/set/actions/runs/13166940745