Table: Implement Sxxx – Tabelle weiterer Bearbeitungsvermerke

[TruongQuangSB]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Test Results

131 tests  ±0   131 ✅ ±0   30s ⏱️ +7s
 31 suites ±0     0 💤 ±0 
 31 files   ±0     0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 38f37ec. ± Comparison against base commit 3ee809b.

This pull request removes 9 and adds 9 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.

org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[1] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@68868328
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[2] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@544e8149
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[3] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@f6de586
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[4] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@7c847072
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[5] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@23f86d8a
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[1] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@795faad, expected=multi/container-id/2025652936/element-id]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[2] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@69f3e556, expected=multi/456/1206258545/123]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[1] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@99c3cee, second=other], expected=multi/container-id/1482010861/element-id/other=other]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[2] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@60ab895f, second=xxx], expected=multi/456/1097632693/123/other=xxx]

org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[1] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@38eb0f4d
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[2] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@74ea46e2
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[3] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@77bb48d5
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[4] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@12d5c30e
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[5] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@26586b74
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[1] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@210d3a42, expected=multi/container-id/213063852/element-id]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[2] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@6f4adaab, expected=multi/456/1978560393/123]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[1] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@75bf9e67, second=other], expected=multi/container-id/679137498/element-id/other=other]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[2] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@45c408a4, second=xxx], expected=multi/456/444700929/123/other=xxx]

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[mariusheine]

@TruongQuangSB Something is weird in the table diffs: #2162

[TruongQuangSB]

@TruongQuangSB Something is weird in the table diffs: #2162

ahh, i have create SWTBot testcase for this table, but it is still in development mode and can't testen 😄

[mariusheine]

@TruongQuangSB I will apply some changes for filling column C instead of removing rows frm the Sxxx. All your changes look fine so far

[TruongQuangSB]

@TruongQuangSB I will apply some changes for filling column C instead of removing rows frm the Sxxx. All your changes look fine so far

@mariusheine instead remove, should we write die reference table in Column C ?

[mariusheine]

@TruongQuangSB I will apply some changes for filling column C instead of removing rows frm the Sxxx. All your changes look fine so far

@mariusheine instead remove, should we write die reference table in Column C ?

@TruongQuangSB Exacly.