Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add rpc stream type #249

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2024
Merged

feat: add rpc stream type #249

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2024

Conversation

akitaSummer
Copy link
Contributor

@akitaSummer akitaSummer commented Oct 10, 2024

Checklist
  • npm test passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)
Description of change

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new enum value, SOFA_RPC_STREAM, to enhance controller and method type definitions, providing greater flexibility in the application.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new enumeration value, SOFA_RPC_STREAM, to both the ControllerType and MethodType enums within the core/types/controller-decorator/model/types.ts file. This update enhances the existing type definitions by adding a new type of controller and method, allowing for greater flexibility in their usage. No other modifications to existing types or structures are included in this update.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
core/types/controller-decorator/model/types.ts Added SOFA_RPC_STREAM to ControllerType and MethodType enums.

Poem

In the code where rabbits play,
A new type hops in today!
SOFA_RPC_STREAM joins the fun,
Expanding enums, one by one.
With every change, we leap and cheer,
For flexibility brings us near! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
core/types/controller-decorator/model/types.ts (1)

11-11: LGTM! Consider updating related documentation.

The addition of SOFA_RPC_STREAM to the ControllerType enum is logical and follows the existing naming conventions. It extends the RPC-related types, which seems to align with the PR's objective of adding an RPC stream type.

Consider updating any related documentation or usage guides to reflect this new controller type, ensuring that developers are aware of its purpose and proper usage.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d29c94f and dec065f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • core/types/controller-decorator/model/types.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
core/types/controller-decorator/model/types.ts (2)

Line range hint 1-48: Overall, the changes look good and align with the PR objective.

The additions of SOFA_RPC_STREAM to both ControllerType and MethodType enums are consistent and follow existing conventions. These changes enhance the type system to support the new RPC stream type as intended.

To ensure a smooth integration of these changes:

  1. Update any related documentation to explain the purpose and usage of the new SOFA_RPC_STREAM type.
  2. Verify and update any switch statements or type checks in the codebase that exhaustively handle these enums.
  3. Consider adding tests to cover the new enum values and their interactions with existing code.

25-25: LGTM! Verify enum usage in the codebase.

The addition of SOFA_RPC_STREAM to the MethodType enum is consistent with the change made to ControllerType and follows the existing structure and naming conventions.

To ensure that this change doesn't break any existing code, please verify that all switch statements or type checks that exhaustively handle these enums are updated accordingly. Run the following script to identify potential areas that might need updates:

Review the output and update any code that might need to handle the new SOFA_RPC_STREAM type.

Copy link
Contributor

@killagu killagu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@killagu killagu merged commit 7f3d40b into master Oct 10, 2024
12 checks passed
@killagu killagu deleted the feat/add-sofa-rpc-stream branch October 10, 2024 12:09
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 9, 2024
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants