Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI] SecureHdfsRepositoryAnalysisRestIT class failing #118970

Closed
elasticsearchmachine opened this issue Dec 18, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #119571
Closed

[CI] SecureHdfsRepositoryAnalysisRestIT class failing #118970

elasticsearchmachine opened this issue Dec 18, 2024 · 4 comments · Fixed by #119571
Labels
:Delivery/Build Build or test infrastructure :Distributed Coordination/Snapshot/Restore Anything directly related to the `_snapshot/*` APIs low-risk An open issue or test failure that is a low risk to future releases Team:Delivery Meta label for Delivery team Team:Distributed Coordination Meta label for Distributed Coordination team >test-failure Triaged test failures from CI

Comments

@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Build Scans:

Reproduction Line:

undefined

Applicable branches:
main

Reproduces locally?:
N/A

Failure History:
See dashboard

Failure Message:

undefined

Issue Reasons:

  • [main] 2 failures in class org.elasticsearch.repositories.blobstore.testkit.analyze.SecureHdfsRepositoryAnalysisRestIT (0.5% fail rate in 382 executions)

Note:
This issue was created using new test triage automation. Please report issues or feedback to es-delivery.

@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added :Distributed Coordination/Snapshot/Restore Anything directly related to the `_snapshot/*` APIs >test-failure Triaged test failures from CI labels Dec 18, 2024
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This has been muted on branch main

Mute Reasons:

  • [main] 2 failures in class org.elasticsearch.repositories.blobstore.testkit.analyze.SecureHdfsRepositoryAnalysisRestIT (0.5% fail rate in 382 executions)

Build Scans:

elasticsearchmachine added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 18, 2024
…dfsRepositoryAnalysisRestIT org.elasticsearch.repositories.blobstore.testkit.analyze.SecureHdfsRepositoryAnalysisRestIT #118970
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added needs:risk Requires assignment of a risk label (low, medium, blocker) Team:Distributed Coordination Meta label for Distributed Coordination team labels Dec 18, 2024
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Pinging @elastic/es-distributed-coordination (Team:Distributed Coordination)

navarone-feekery pushed a commit to navarone-feekery/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Dec 26, 2024
…dfsRepositoryAnalysisRestIT org.elasticsearch.repositories.blobstore.testkit.analyze.SecureHdfsRepositoryAnalysisRestIT elastic#118970
@ywangd ywangd added low-risk An open issue or test failure that is a low risk to future releases and removed needs:risk Requires assignment of a risk label (low, medium, blocker) labels Jan 6, 2025
@ywangd
Copy link
Member

ywangd commented Jan 6, 2025

This seems to be the same issue as #116537 and many other failures due to docker container not coming up properly. It should be fixed by #118331

@ywangd ywangd added the :Delivery/Build Build or test infrastructure label Jan 6, 2025
ywangd added a commit to ywangd/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Jan 6, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added the Team:Delivery Meta label for Delivery team label Jan 6, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Pinging @elastic/es-delivery (Team:Delivery)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Delivery/Build Build or test infrastructure :Distributed Coordination/Snapshot/Restore Anything directly related to the `_snapshot/*` APIs low-risk An open issue or test failure that is a low risk to future releases Team:Delivery Meta label for Delivery team Team:Distributed Coordination Meta label for Distributed Coordination team >test-failure Triaged test failures from CI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants