Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add 9.0 branch to the CI branches definition #16997

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

mashhurs
Copy link
Contributor

Release notes

[rn:skip]

What does this PR do?

Adds 9.0 branch to the CI branches.

Why is it important/What is the impact to the user?

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files (and/or docker env variables)
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

Author's Checklist

  • [ ]

How to test this PR locally

Related issues

Use cases

Screenshots

Logs

Copy link
Member

@donoghuc donoghuc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good clean JSON 🫡

@mashhurs mashhurs merged commit 786911f into elastic:main Jan 30, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
@mashhurs mashhurs deleted the add-9.0-to-ci-branches branch January 30, 2025 19:37
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

💚 Build Succeeded

andsel pushed a commit to andsel/logstash that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants