devop: vite 6 and package updates #612
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request updates dependency versions across multiple Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
💼 Build Files |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/extension/vite.config.ts (1)
123-123: LGTM! Consider adding documentation.The
fsalias to an empty implementation is a good practice for browser extensions.Consider adding a comment explaining why this alias is needed:
alias: { '@': fileURLToPath(new URL('./src', import.meta.url)), '@action': fileURLToPath(new URL('./src/ui/action', import.meta.url)), - fs: './configs/vite/empty.js', + // Provide empty fs implementation for browser environment + fs: './configs/vite/empty.js', },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/extension/configs/vite/empty.js(1 hunks)packages/extension/vite.config.ts(4 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/extension/configs/vite/empty.js
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: buildAll
- GitHub Check: test
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/extension/vite.config.ts (3)
73-73:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify dependency on 'os' module.
The
osmodule polyfill has been added. Please ensure this is required by new dependencies or functionality.Let's check for usage of the
osmodule:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for 'os' module usage in the codebase rg "from ['\"](os|node:os)['\"]" --type ts rg "require\(['\"]os['\"]\)" --type tsLength of output: 93
Dependency on 'os' Module: Verify Its Necessity
The
ospolyfill has been added, but our current search across TypeScript files did not reveal any direct usage of the module (e.g., viafrom 'os'orrequire('os')). Please manually verify if this polyfill is truly required by new dependencies or functionality, or if it can be safely removed.
- Re-check if any new dependency or middleware uses OS-related APIs.
- Confirm if the inclusion is a remnant of earlier testing or genuinely needed for future code.
35-37:✅ Verification successful
LGTM! Verify Vite version compatibility.
The
skipWebSocketTokenCheckoption is correctly added for Vite 6 compatibility.Let's verify the Vite version in package.json:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check Vite version in package.json jq '.devDependencies.vite' packages/extension/package.jsonLength of output: 67
LGTM: Vite 6 Compatibility Confirmed
The legacy configuration in
packages/extension/vite.config.tsintroducingskipWebSocketTokenCheck: trueis correctly implemented for Vite 6. The package’sdevDependenciesconfirms the use of Vite version"^6.1.0", so no further changes are needed here.
104-104:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify bundle size impact.
Setting
external: []means all dependencies will be bundled. This could impact the extension's bundle size.Since the visualizer plugin is already configured, you can check the bundle size impact after building:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Build and check the stats file npm run build ls -l stats.htmlLength of output: 314
Manual Verification Required for Bundle Size Impact
It appears that the build process couldn’t be executed using
npm run build(the build script is missing), which prevented generating the bundle size stats (e.g., thestats.htmlfile). This obscures the immediate impact of settingexternal: []in the Rollup options, where all dependencies will be bundled.
- Issue: No build script is defined in the package (as indicated by the missing script error), so the intended bundle size inspection via the visualizer plugin hasn’t been performed.
- Action: Please verify that the correct build command is in place (e.g., using
vite buildor defining the appropriatebuildscript in your package.json) and re-run the bundle analysis. Ensure that bundling all dependencies (i.e., leavingexternalas an empty array) doesn’t adversely affect your bundle size.
|
Marking it as stale it is already included in the 'devop/release-2.2.2' branch |
Summary by CodeRabbit
These updates, while mostly behind the scenes, contribute to a more robust and dependable application for users.