You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I did some bigger changes to use segno instead of qrcode to generate the QR codes, with the main goal to use micro QR codes. I expected that they will result in better recognition rate at small dimensions.
But after some, indeed not strictly methodical, testing it seems that the best in case of recognition is the use of normal QR codes with error correction "H".
Therefore I suggest to set also with qrcode the error correction level to "H", since in my understanding qrcode in contrast to segno is not using the maximal possible error correction level.
I didn't filed an other pull request, as the changes are quite big and i don't want to hijack your great project. But maybe my observations are of interest for you, or some one else.
If some one is interested here are my test results. The labels where printed at 1200x600dpi with no toner saving on an OKI MC332dn, which was also used for scanning.
scan Setting
scan lib
orientation
qrcode
segno QR
segno microQR EC „M“
segno microQR EC „Q“
100dpi grayscale
zbar
~30°
fail
fail
fail*
-
150dpi grayscale
zbar
~30°
fail
fail
fail*
-
300dpi grayscale
zbar
~30°
success
success
fail*
-
150dpi grayscale
zxing
~30°
fail
fail
success
-
100dpi grayscale
zxing
~30°
fail
fail
fail
-
100dpi grayscale
zxing
~0°
fail
fail
fail
-
150dpi grayscale
zxing
~0°
fail
success
fail
-
100dpi grayscale
zxing
~0°
-
0 / 2
-
1 / 2
150dpi grayscale
zxing
~0°
-
1 / 2
-
0 / 2
150dpi color
zxing
~0°
-
2 / 2
-
0 / 2
200dpi grayscale
zxing
~0°
-
2 / 2
-
1 / 2
300dpi grayscale
zxing
~0°
-
2 / 2
-
2 / 2
*Most probably micro QR codes are not supported by zbar
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I did some bigger changes to use segno instead of qrcode to generate the QR codes, with the main goal to use micro QR codes. I expected that they will result in better recognition rate at small dimensions.
But after some, indeed not strictly methodical, testing it seems that the best in case of recognition is the use of normal QR codes with error correction "H".
Therefore I suggest to set also with qrcode the error correction level to "H", since in my understanding qrcode in contrast to segno is not using the maximal possible error correction level.
I didn't filed an other pull request, as the changes are quite big and i don't want to hijack your great project. But maybe my observations are of interest for you, or some one else.
If some one is interested here are my test results. The labels where printed at 1200x600dpi with no toner saving on an OKI MC332dn, which was also used for scanning.
*Most probably micro QR codes are not supported by zbar
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: