We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
if a rule has a very large number of test cases, it would be fine to reorder them based on options.
options
this rule can enforce code like this to improve readability:
new RuleTester().run('foo', bar, { valid: [ // valid tests for options: ['foo'] { code: 'codeA', options: ['foo'] }, { code: 'codeB', options: ['foo'] }, // and more... // valid tests for options: ['bar'] { code: 'codeA', options: ['bar'] }, { code: 'codeB', options: ['bar'] }, // and more... ], });
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
How would ordering be determined? For example, does options: ['foo'] come before options: ['foo', 'bar']?
options: ['foo']
options: ['foo', 'bar']
Sorry, something went wrong.
it aims to put the tests having same options together, but it's fine to add an option to enforce options ordering alphabetically:
// tests for options: [] ... // tests for options: ['bar'] ... // tests for options: ['bar', 'foo'] ... // tests for options: ['foo'] ...
Sounds good to me. I don't think it's necessary to make the options alphabetical -- that seems like it could be confusing.
No branches or pull requests
if a rule has a very large number of test cases, it would be fine to reorder them based on
options
.this rule can enforce code like this to improve readability:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: