Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 22, 2020. It is now read-only.

Make it compatible with pep-0249 #37

Open
gawry opened this issue Jul 12, 2013 · 1 comment
Open

Make it compatible with pep-0249 #37

gawry opened this issue Jul 12, 2013 · 1 comment

Comments

@gawry
Copy link

gawry commented Jul 12, 2013

It would be great if the library was compatible with PEP-0249 so we could for exemple create code tests using SQLite in memory and would be easier to make code compatible with other databases. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0249/

@jskorpan
Copy link

jskorpan commented Aug 5, 2013

Yes, that’s just some work to get there. But it’s definitely the “next big thing” when we get around to it.

Captain Hindsight says – It would have been better to follow Python DB API spec when implementing umysql in the first place

//JT

From: Gustavo Gawryszewski [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: den 12 juli 2013 15:13
To: esnme/ultramysql
Subject: [ultramysql] Make it compatible with pep-0249 (#37)

It would be great if the library was compatible with PEP-0249 so we could for exemple create code tests using SQLite in memory and would be easier to make code compatible with other databases. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0249/


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/37.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants