-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove passing of anonymous visualize function #19089
Closed
Comments
As
|
Hello @serathius , i'd like to work on this ? |
Hi, I submitted a PR please review. Thanks. |
/assign @VidhuSarwal |
@VidhuSarwal Are you still working on this? If you have no time, i would like to help.😊 |
Sure, I am having issues to get it pass the tests, also not able to put in time to it due to the same. On 29 Jan 2025 04:43, Zhengke Zhou ***@***.***> wrote:
@VidhuSarwal Are you still working on this? If you have no time, i would like to help.😊
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
What would you like to be added?
Before linearizationInfo was a private struct we were not able to return the results up the call stack. So I wrapped the function I needed and passed it like
etcd/tests/robustness/validate/operations.go
Lines 49 to 56 in e4d1da7
With https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/main/tests/robustness/validate/operations.go#L49-L56 making the struct piblic we can simply replace it with passing it linearizationInfo.
Why is this needed?
Cleanup code
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: