-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 144
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ata path_id #242
Comments
Thanks for reporting this. At a first glance, Also it seems that there are more changes in Please convert to a Pull Request and close this issue - PRs are much easier to review and change until they get ready to be merged. |
yes the are more changes but this is what was dropped in the past |
you said path will leak
i have no ideea how to create a pull request and.. don't need to know :-) |
Better make it consistent with compat_path:
and do not use free at all, because About the pull request - that is part of the current project workflow, and if you do not know how to do that, it is perfectly fine, someone of us will do it when they have time. The patch above needs some more work to sync the other changes and then it will be good to merge. |
yes you're right using free() is a pain in the a..s for udevd .. it seems that it cannot use that variable after free
|
I hit this on an Alpine Linux system with eudev. SATA disks are missing, and I also notice that NVME disks do not show up in /dev/disk/by-path. Running eudev-3.2.11-r7 against kernel 5.15.103-0-lts, both from Alpine packages. I have two USB disks (sdb and sdc), 1 SATA disk (sda), and 1 NVME disk (nvme0n1), but only the USB disks show up in /dev/disk/by-path.
|
i'm on PCLinuxOS and tested on kernel 5.4.236 and 6.1.20 - no issues here
[EDIT] |
I just wanted to voice my support for these changes as I was running into an issue with virtio-scsi qemu dvdrom devices not showing up in /dev/disk/by-path, but with the changes detailed in #242 (comment) the symlink is now visible. @yodayox Are you still not interested in submitting a PR? If so, I can submit one (although I am not familiar with the code being changed here) as I'd rather not have to maintain a patch on top of eudev... |
Please see my comment from Nov 2022 - most of the problems were solved but there is one thing left:
My preference is not to merge something half baked. I'd prefer a PR but will also accept a patch as long as it addresses the above. In the case of a patch, I will make the PR and it will need a review and approval. About the PCLinuxOS SRPM - that contains different patches from the one proposed above. Maybe they are worth merging or maybe not. If you are interested, propose them as PRs... |
dropped on the way log time ago and nobody seems to care about..
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1053170.html
so restored by.. me, as follow:
in order to be shipped in next version of eudev
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: