Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment: EXCEPTION_ILLEGAL_INSTRUCTION (0xc000001d) #12786

Open
SanketArdalkar opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 9 comments

Comments

@SanketArdalkar
Copy link

SanketArdalkar commented Jun 21, 2024

It shows problematic frame as C [librocksdbjni14464789980629058905.dll+0x546c29] what should i do. i created jar file of project containing database operation and inserted into another projects extension i.e hivemq brokers extension and this error occured even if i deleted jar file still problem persist.

A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:

#  EXCEPTION_ILLEGAL_INSTRUCTION (0xc000001d) at pc=0x00007ffb94946c29, pid=9408, tid=11796
#
# JRE version: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment 18.9 (11.0.22+9) (build 11.0.22+9-LTS-219)
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 18.9 (11.0.22+9-LTS-219, mixed mode, tiered, compressed oops, g1 gc, windows-amd64)
# Problematic frame:
# C  [librocksdbjni14464789980629058905.dll+0x546c29]
#
# No core dump will be written. Minidumps are not enabled by default on client versions of Windows
#
# If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
#   https://bugreport.java.com/bugreport/crash.jsp
# The crash happened outside the Java Virtual Machine in native code.
# See problematic frame for where to report the bug.
@adamretter
Copy link
Collaborator

There is not enough information here to act on. Can you provide the stack trace please?

@SanketArdalkar
Copy link
Author

hs_err_pid12608.log
check above file.
Do you think it would work if i delete hivemq and again download it ?
librocksdb files are present in hivemq application or they are part of java?
TIA

@stefan-zobel
Copy link
Contributor

That CPU is a Westmere-EP microarchitecture from 2010 (before Sandy Bridge) which only has SSE4.2 instruction set extensions.
It's almost impossible that a recent rocksdbjni build can run on this CPU. You'd need a portable build with flags -DPORTABLE=1
(and possibly also -DSNAPPY_HAVE_BMI2=0).

See #11096 which is a very similar issue.

@SanketArdalkar
Copy link
Author

before inserting jar in the application it was running fine and i have removed the jar and i want that application should run like it was running before inserting the jar i dont want that jar containing database to run with application. help me so that i can run my application like it was running before insertion of jar.
TIA

@adamretter
Copy link
Collaborator

That CPU is a Westmere-EP microarchitecture from 2010 (before Sandy Bridge) which only has SSE4.2 instruction set extensions. It's almost impossible that a recent rocksdbjni build can run on this CPU. You'd need a portable build with flags DPORTABLE=1 (and possibly also -DSNAPPY_HAVE_BMI2=0)

@stefan-zobel All RocksJava releases published to Maven central are already built with PORTABLE=1

@adamretter
Copy link
Collaborator

adamretter commented Jun 21, 2024

Do you think it would work if i delete hivemq and again download it ?
librocksdb files are present in hivemq application or they are part of java?

@SanketArdalkar We cannot comment on the HiveMQ project - I suggest you contact them.

RocksJava includes the RocksDB native library. I don't know what HiveMQ do.

@stefan-zobel
Copy link
Contributor

That CPU is a Westmere-EP microarchitecture from 2010 (before Sandy Bridge) which only has SSE4.2 instruction set extensions. It's almost impossible that a recent rocksdbjni build can run on this CPU. You'd need a portable build with flags DPORTABLE=1 (and possibly also -DSNAPPY_HAVE_BMI2=0)

@stefan-zobel All RocksJava releases published to Maven central are already built with PORTABLE=1

@adamretter That means AVX2 is disabled for the builds on Maven central?

@adamretter
Copy link
Collaborator

If that is blocked by PORTABLE=1, then yes

@stefan-zobel
Copy link
Contributor

If that is blocked by PORTABLE=1, then yes

@adamretter Thanks for the confirmation. According to https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Building-on-Windows the /arch:AVX2 flag is blocked by -DPORTABLE=1.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants