You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello authors, thank you for your excellent work. I would like to ask why, in SAM1, the image is first resized by its long side to 1024, and then padded for the short side, whereas in SAM2, the image is directly resized to (1024, 1024) using PIL.Image's resize method. Wouldn't this cause distortion of the aspect ratio?
Additionally, which resolution and which pixels are the loss applied to during training?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello authors, thank you for your excellent work. I would like to ask why, in SAM1, the image is first resized by its long side to 1024, and then padded for the short side, whereas in SAM2, the image is directly resized to
(1024, 1024)
usingPIL.Image
's resize method. Wouldn't this cause distortion of the aspect ratio?Additionally, which resolution and which pixels are the loss applied to during training?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: