You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Considering mp_Z, or other big integer representation,
perhaps there should be a SmallInteger type.
There is consistent way to get the smallest or largest integer.
Slices without a lower bound start at #zero for the Integer type,
but Slice_from has no upper bound.
There's no notation for a counted slice.
This all inconsistent.
We should consider, default end points as minimum and maximum
values of the type, and provide a way to find them.
Also, there's no reason to restrict slices to Integers.
Iterating through the range of pointers to elements of an array seems natural
for example. Or through the characters. Slices of unicode seem useful too.
Not all total orders are enumerable, but those that are should
provide slices.
Of those that are enumerable, some have an integral enumeration,
which implies the existence of an ordinal function.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
is not the substring of s between a and b inclusive. Instead, if a or b are negative, they're munged, so that -1 is the last index position in the string, -2 the second last, etc.
Inconsistent. I need a way to handle the negatives as mentioned here but it doesn't fit with slices of the sequence of Integers.
Slices currently require Integer type.
Considering mp_Z, or other big integer representation,
perhaps there should be a SmallInteger type.
There is consistent way to get the smallest or largest integer.
Slices without a lower bound start at #zero for the Integer type,
but Slice_from has no upper bound.
There's no notation for a counted slice.
This all inconsistent.
We should consider, default end points as minimum and maximum
values of the type, and provide a way to find them.
Also, there's no reason to restrict slices to Integers.
Iterating through the range of pointers to elements of an array seems natural
for example. Or through the characters. Slices of unicode seem useful too.
Not all total orders are enumerable, but those that are should
provide slices.
Of those that are enumerable, some have an integral enumeration,
which implies the existence of an ordinal function.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: