Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Advanced feature implementation #28

Open
2 tasks
fh1ch opened this issue Jun 28, 2017 · 3 comments
Open
2 tasks

Advanced feature implementation #28

fh1ch opened this issue Jun 28, 2017 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@fh1ch
Copy link
Owner

fh1ch commented Jun 28, 2017

This issue shall collect all ideas for advanced features to be implemented in a future release:

@fh1ch fh1ch added the meta label Jun 28, 2017
@fh1ch fh1ch self-assigned this Jun 28, 2017
@fh1ch fh1ch changed the title Advanced Feature Implementation Advanced feature implementation Jun 28, 2017
@fh1ch fh1ch removed the help wanted label Jul 19, 2017
@hardillb
Copy link

Hi, have you any plans to add support for bacnet over RS485 (mstp)?

@fh1ch
Copy link
Owner Author

fh1ch commented Aug 21, 2017

Hi @hardillb

Sorry, no plans so far. I don't have a use-case for it and don't know MSTP to well. However, BBMD support is currently in the making and acessing MSTP devices over a router should therefore be possible.

@tjohnsonhvac
Copy link

@fh1ch
I am working on MSTP discovery right now. I have the who-is-router-to-network request working. I'm now working on the i-am-router-to-to-network response.
One issue i an having is the i-am-router-to-to-network response is a network layer message which the client.js is set to drop any received network layer messages. What is the reason for dropping these messages?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants