Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Behavior of --squeeze coupled with sequence selection #64

Open
metasoarous opened this issue Jan 26, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Behavior of --squeeze coupled with sequence selection #64

metasoarous opened this issue Jan 26, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@metasoarous
Copy link
Member

I just tried running seqmagick convert --squeeze --include-from-file seq-id-file input.fasta output.fasta, hoping that I'd be able to "squeeze" out all of the columns which end up being all gaps when I select out just the specified set of sequences. Unfortunately, this doesn't work. My guess is that --squeeze only looks at column compositions before downsampling. Admittedly this can be worked around doing a two step pipe thing (seqmagick convert --include-from-file seq-id-file input.fasta - | seqmagick convert --squeeze - output.fasta), but I wonder what the "least surprise" here is, and whether this case isn't worth handling here?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant