Repository Organization: Feedback and Suggestions Welcome!

[fielding]

Repository Organization and Structure

As our collection of Copilot instruction files grows, it's important to ensure that our repository remains well-organized and user-friendly. We've organized the instruction files by programming language, with further subdivisions for specific libraries or frameworks.

Current Structure:

copilot-instructions/
├── instructions/
    ├── python/
    │   ├── base.md
    │   ├── numpy.md
    │   ├── pandas.md
    ├── javascript/
    │   ├── base.md
    │   ├── react.md
    └── [other languages]/

Purpose of This Discussion:

• Gather Feedback: We'd love to hear your thoughts on the current organization.
• Explore Improvements: Are there alternative structures that might make navigation and usage easier?
• Enhance Usability: Our goal is to make the repository as accessible and helpful as possible.

Points to Consider:

• Hierarchy Depth: Is the current level of nesting appropriate, or should we adjust it?
• File Naming: Are the instruction file names clear and descriptive?
• Scalability: Will this structure accommodate future growth as more instruction files are added?

Questions for the Community:

1. Do you find the current directory structure intuitive and easy to navigate?
2. Would you prefer a different organization method (e.g., grouping by framework instead of language)?
3. Do you have suggestions for improving file naming conventions?

Your input will help us optimize the repository to better serve the community.