Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Request] support direct bind to view? #13

Open
zeltak opened this issue Oct 25, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

[Request] support direct bind to view? #13

zeltak opened this issue Oct 25, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@zeltak
Copy link

zeltak commented Oct 25, 2018

hi again

I wonder if its possible to add a switch (ie keepmenu -d?) to launch keepmenu direct into view mode without first pressing `view/type individual entries'

for me i view alot of info in entries throughout the day and it could make life just a tad easier :D

thx

Z

@firecat53
Copy link
Owner

I took a look at this for awhile. It is possible. Is it worth the added code complexity to save one keystroke? You just have to hit 'Enter' to open the 'View/Type' menu (it's the default selection). Unless you're binding 'keepmenu -d' to a separate keybinding in your window manager, you use more keystrokes to type ' -d' then just hitting 'Enter'. I'm open to more arguments or other possible uses for command line switches, but my instinct is keep it as simple as possible.

@zeltak
Copy link
Author

zeltak commented Oct 25, 2018

yeah i guess i see your logic and can live with it :D
I would indeed have 2 separate binds for each argument but i understand your point

@firecat53
Copy link
Owner

firecat53 commented Oct 25, 2018 via email

@pkfm
Copy link

pkfm commented Dec 11, 2019

Bind to or alias a script like this:

#!/usr/bin/env bash
~/.local/bin/keepmenu
sleep 0.1  # adjust as needed
xdotool key Return

What would be more useful, though hardly necessary, are keybinds or menu entries that allow backward navigation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants