-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 626
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Symmetry breaks quickly in simple flow #13764
Comments
With a quick look. The .out file show these all have the same properties and if I add slices for specific heat, conductivity, etc. Those show identical values until temperature starts to change in which case conductivity increases with temperature. This doesn't seem to be something wrong with the functions for getting properties. |
I don't think so either. I'm just surprised at how quickly the symmetry and iso-thermal break down. Like in 3 time steps. No time step changes, no changes in geom, no obsts, no mesh boundaries. |
It also doesn't happen if one of the VENTs is the background species or both vents are the same species. Only when the two vents are A and B |
Nice clue. |
How did you apply the BG species at the VENT. I get
|
Nevermind. I know how. |
Setting |
It is still seen with just a 2 cell wide domain but not as strong &HEAD CHID='test' / &MESH IJK=8,1,4, XB=0.0,0.8,-0.001,0.001,0.2,0.6 / &TIME T_END=2,DT=0.01 / &PRES CHECK_POISSON=T / &MISC STRATIFICATION=F, NOISE=F, CONSTANT_SPECIFIC_HEAT_RATIO=T / &SPEC ID='GAS BG', MW=29, BACKGROUND=T / &SURF ID='WALL', FREE_SLIP=T, DEFAULT=.TRUE. / &SURF ID='BLOW A', VEL=-0.5, MASS_FRACTION(1)=1., SPEC_ID(1)='GAS A' / &VENT XB=0.0,0.0,-0.001,0.001,0.3,0.4, SURF_ID='BLOW A' / &OBST XB=0,0.8,-0.001,0.001,0.2,0.3/ &VENT PBX=0.8, SURF_ID='OPEN' / &SLCF PBY=0.,QUANTITY='MASS FRACTION', SPEC_ID='GAS A', CELL_CENTERED=T, VECTOR=T / &TAIL/ |
Run this case below. It only takes a few seconds. The resulting flow should be symmetric and isothermal, but it is neither. It is worst when
CONSTANT_SPECIFIC_HEAT_RATIO=T
, but it still fails if isF
. If I remove one of theVENTs
injecting the gas, the case remains iso-thermal, but obviously not symmetric.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: