Replies: 14 comments 44 replies
-
|
The channels list already feels like something that can become cluttered quickly, so one thing I don't really like are the link types. It feels like they could be placed inside of an "information"-type channel instead, or what the documentation type does |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I like the idea of a calendar channel and doc/info channel that can be just a markdown edited document |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Just adding that some matrix clients do this, like Commet (https://commet.chat/), which has the "calendar" and "photo album" channel types, and these can be useful for some communities/groups. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I think a Hub/Board Channel Type would be very nice to have (just like Discord's forum), for Developer servers a Hub Channel type would be good for searching projects from other people. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
as #530 got closed with the note I should move here. Which I do with this post :-)
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
is the Documentation channel type for a Wiki style channel? Because having a Wiki on fluxer would be incredible and let us avoid relying on Fandom |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I want to also bring up a new channel type that Discord is recently working on, Spoiler Channels. It functionals simliarily to NSFW channels but non-NSFW (same protections are inherited from regular channels) and does not require age verification. This is for communities, where movie/game spoiler matters or talked about heavy subjects, such as polictics or religion. Source: https://xcancel.com/DiscordPreviews/status/2049095808851599738#m |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Something that could probably solve a bunch of the clutter problems and make some of these other channel types look nicer would be to have a channel that can behave as a sub-category. At first you'd think of something like discord threads BUT, what I have in mind is a bit more flexible. Basically you'd be able to allow channels to have a collapsible list of other channels attached to it. So you'd have a nice list of link channels that doesn't get messy, or be able to implement this "link in bio" idea a bit more simple and clean. You'd also be able to have different directories (I guess) for the document channel type suggested above. But overall you'd be able to organize the main channel types (text, voice, link) in a way that lets you attach related sub-channels right to them, so you could have a link or voice channel and then have a text channel attached to it. Of course as more channel types get added they'd also benefit from this functionality. I'd imagine tho that you'd want to restrict the depth of sub-categories to just 1 or 2, and default to collapsed, just to avoid making the channel lists look too cluttered and janky. Edit: Also for permissions, I'd imagine you could add a secondary permission list to the main channel so that sub-channels would inherit permissions based on those permissions instead of the main channel's first permissions. So you could have read only and such, but also not have perms become too messy each time you move a channel to a different category or subcategory. Defaults would be something like sub-channels always inherit a main channel's secondary permissions unless otherwise stated, and when moved to a category they'd automatically sync to the category's permissions by default. Edit2: Further clarification, this is not my take on what threads should be like for Fluxer. I think threads and channels should have a clear distinction between each other so they aren't as confusing to navigate (like on discord.) but I plan to make a post later that goes into that in more depth. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.










Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Problem
First off : this is by no mean urgent. Thanks a lot for all the work produced !
Also, english is not my main language so I excuse for the weird sentences.
Right now there are three channel types :
Per the roadmap, forums, threads and stage channels are also part of the plan.
On the long term, however, I believe it would be interesting to integrate even more channel types.
Caution
Those suppositions are, as their name suggests, purely theoretical. This list is purely here as a suggestion, I am not able to assess the feasibility of those proposal. Please, if one (or all) of the proposals seem inconceivable even in a distant future, notify me so I can remove it. My intention is merely to give ideas and to help group ideas of channels in one issue. By no mean do I intend on putting pressure on anyone !
Proposed solution
Notes (optional)
If anyone wishes to add on this, whether by adding on one of the already mentioned proposals, or with a new one, please, do !
This issue is bound to be edited as ideas come and go.
If creating such a "large scale" issue (in a way, I mean idk) is a problem, I am very sorry for the inconvenience caused :/
Checks
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions