Rethink issue automation

[LukasWallrich]

Currently we have a bot that closes stale issues - maybe that is worth keeping, but exempting issues that are labelled as "will-fix" so that planned changes do not get lost. The bot also shifts these tasks to done on the project board, which clearly seems to be a mistake?

@flavioazevedo let's discuss once we have clarity on the next steps with the website

[github-actions]

This issue has been inactive for more than 90 days. If there is no further activity, it will be automatically closed in seven days time. You can reopen the issue if it is still relevant.

[LukasWallrich]

keep open

[github-actions]

This issue has been inactive for more than 90 days. If there is no further activity, it will be automatically closed in seven days time. You can reopen the issue if it is still relevant.

[LukasWallrich]

Open

…

On Fri, 10 Jan 2025, 09:25 github-actions[bot], ***@***.***> wrote: This issue has been inactive for more than 90 days. If there is no further activity, it will be automatically closed in seven days time. You can reopen the issue if it is still relevant. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#163 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOK6NGMQMNDLCUDSASZYVST2J4VTLAVCNFSM6AAAAABN6X67BGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKOBRGYYTINBWGA> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[github-actions]

This issue has been inactive for more than 90 days. If there is no further activity, it will be automatically closed in seven days time. You can reopen the issue if it is still relevant.

[flavioazevedo]

Please let's discuss this. I do like the constant (but also annoying) reminders. Keeps us on our feet. It is just too much at the moment, and hence, things "feel" late, but we are consistently knocking them down.

[LukasWallrich]

@flavioazevedo I added a new needs-discussion label - let's put that onto issues we need to discuss (potentially with @richarddushime as well) so that we can focus our joint reviews