Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: connection-check expected output note #25

Closed
MEllis-github opened this issue Oct 5, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

docs: connection-check expected output note #25

MEllis-github opened this issue Oct 5, 2022 · 1 comment
Milestone

Comments

@MEllis-github
Copy link
Contributor

Minor suggestion with respect to the expected output shown here https://github.com/foundation-model-stack/multi-nic-cni/tree/main/connection-check and here https://github.com/foundation-model-stack/multi-nic-cni#check-connections:
state the assumption that no jobs using the same network are running when the check is performed. Otherwise the output is more similar to the following until other jobs are brought down.

bash-3.2$  kubectl logs job/multi-nic-concheck
...
2022/10/05 21:55:08 45/45 servers successfully created
2022/10/05 21:55:09 vlanl3-a100-large-drlfv-worker-3-with-secondary-7lg74-serve: Pending
2022/10/05 21:55:20 vlanl3-a100-large-drlfv-worker-3-with-secondary-txxjg-serve: Pending
2022/10/05 21:55:43 Some job is still running: vlanl3-a100-large-drlfv-worker-3-with-secondary-l8cfw-clien
2022/10/05 21:55:48 Some job is still running: vlanl3-a100-large-drlfv-worker-3-with-secondary-l8cfw-clien
2022/10/05 21:55:53 Some job is still running: vlanl3-a100-large-drlfv-worker-3-with-secondary-l8cfw-clien
...
@sunya-ch sunya-ch added this to the v1.1.0 milestone Feb 2, 2023
@sunya-ch
Copy link
Collaborator

Done by #134

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants