Since adding a dedicated "Rune" trait isn’t preferred, could rune-related items be categorized using the "Other Tags" system instead?
Adding consistent tags for runes under "Other Tags" would make them much easier to search and filter in the Compendium Browser, without introducing non-official traits from Paizo Inc. material.
This would significantly improve discoverability of runes, whose names don’t always clearly indicate their type, and reduce the need to rely on external resources like Archives of Nethys.
And sorry if this is a duplicate - my English isn’t very strong, so I’m translating my thoughts with the help of AI.
This approach was suggested in this discussion: #22180
Since adding a dedicated "Rune" trait isn’t preferred, could rune-related items be categorized using the "Other Tags" system instead?
Adding consistent tags for runes under "Other Tags" would make them much easier to search and filter in the Compendium Browser, without introducing non-official traits from Paizo Inc. material.
This would significantly improve discoverability of runes, whose names don’t always clearly indicate their type, and reduce the need to rely on external resources like Archives of Nethys.
And sorry if this is a duplicate - my English isn’t very strong, so I’m translating my thoughts with the help of AI.
This approach was suggested in this discussion: #22180