We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Data in /shared/biodata/example_data
/shared/biodata/example_data
What are recommendations for:
What type of directory structure to model for pre-processed files?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Primary (raw) data storage: fastq
Reference data: shared biodata
Metadata:
Output: files sent to scratch, instructions to copy to home (default on rhino) or fast?
one directory per sample, including alignment file and logs
raw_data_qc
trimmed_data
trimmed_data_qc
mapped_reads (BAM): retain alignment, renaming file to view in IGV (and logs)
mapped_qc, across all samples, plots and samtools output
counts files: individual (richly annotated), and combined (fewer annotations)
Suggested structure from HBC:
rnaseq ├── logs ├── meta ├── raw_data ├── results └── scripts
Structure used by Data Carpentry, modified for RNAseq:
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Data in
/shared/biodata/example_data
What are recommendations for:
What type of directory structure to model for pre-processed files?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: