Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase Code Coverage for Existing Plugin Functionality #179

Closed
zacdezgeo opened this issue Dec 20, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #190
Closed

Increase Code Coverage for Existing Plugin Functionality #179

zacdezgeo opened this issue Dec 20, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #190
Assignees

Comments

@zacdezgeo
Copy link
Collaborator

zacdezgeo commented Dec 20, 2024

Improving the test coverage of the plugin's existing functionality is essential to ensure stability and reliability. This issue focuses on identifying areas of the codebase with low or no test coverage and implementing unit and integration tests where needed.

Task Requirements

  1. Analyze Current Test Coverage (Add code coverage reporting to CI #186):

    • Use a tool such as pytest-cov to generate a coverage report.
    • Identify untested or under-tested areas of the codebase.
  2. Prioritize Critical Code Paths:

    • Focus on core functionalities such as plugin initialization, configuration, and any user-facing features.
  3. Write Unit Tests:

    • Add tests for standalone functions, modules, and classes that currently lack coverage.
  4. Add Integration Tests:

    • Test workflows that simulate real-world plugin usage, ensuring key functionalities work together seamlessly.
  5. Integrate Coverage Metrics:

    • Update the CI pipeline to include coverage metrics and enforce a minimum coverage threshold (e.g., 80%).
  6. Update Documentation:

    • Document how to run tests locally and how contributors can check and improve coverage.

Part of phase 1 (#174)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant