fix: Remove trailing whitespaces

Author: heltonduarte

README.md

@@ -36,16 +36,16 @@ To evaluate the quality and effectiveness of our security analysis, we benchmark
 
 Our evaluation process is designed to test the extension's ability to identify vulnerabilities in code changes.
 
-1. **Dataset**: We used the [OpenSSF CVE Benchmark](https://github.com/ossf-cve-benchmark/ossf-cve-benchmark), a dataset containing GitHub repositories of real applications in TypeScript / JavaScript. For each vulnerability, the dataset provides the commit containing the vulnerable code (`prePatch`) and the commit where the vulnerability was fixed (`postPatch`).  
-2. **Analysis Target**: For each CVE, we set up the repository and computed the diff between the fixed commit and the vulnerable commit.  
-3. **Report Generation**: We ran the /security:analyze command on this diff to generate a security report.  
+1. **Dataset**: We used the [OpenSSF CVE Benchmark](https://github.com/ossf-cve-benchmark/ossf-cve-benchmark), a dataset containing GitHub repositories of real applications in TypeScript / JavaScript. For each vulnerability, the dataset provides the commit containing the vulnerable code (`prePatch`) and the commit where the vulnerability was fixed (`postPatch`).
+2. **Analysis Target**: For each CVE, we set up the repository and computed the diff between the fixed commit and the vulnerable commit.
+3. **Report Generation**: We ran the /security:analyze command on this diff to generate a security report.
 4. **Validation**: Since the dataset has a small number of repositories, we manually reviewed all the generated security reports and compared with the ground truth to calculate the final precision and recall numbers.
 
 ### Results
 
 Our evaluation on this dataset yielded a precision of **90%** and a recall of **93%**.
 
-* **Precision (90%)** measures the accuracy of our detections. Of all the potential vulnerabilities the extension identified, 90% were actual security risks.  
+* **Precision (90%)** measures the accuracy of our detections. Of all the potential vulnerabilities the extension identified, 90% were actual security risks.
 * **Recall (93%)** measures the completeness of our coverage. The extension successfully identified 93% of all the known vulnerabilities present in the dataset.
 
 ### Caveat